Liviya James

Palm Oil: Report 19

Rapid Response Monitoring System

Palm Oil, Report 19 | September 2019

Prepared with support from MapHubs

New Cases: Unknown Group: Cambridge Alliance Sdn Bhd, Unknown Group: KUD Restu Bersama, Lee Ling Timber Group: Lima Jaya Timber Sdn Bhd (Limbang), Lee Ling Timber Group: Lima Jaya Timber Sdn Bhd (LPF/0038 – part 2), Pelita Holdings Sdn Bhd: Pelita Holdings Sdn Bhd (LCDA-OT/9137), First Borneo Group: PT Berkah Sawit Abadi, Unknown Group: Selangor Oil Palm Industries Corporation Sdn Bhs, Unknown Group: Telliana Enterprise Sdn Bhd, Unknown Group: Titanium Management Sdn Bhd (Part 1), Unknown Group: Titanium Management Sdn Bhd (Part 2), Unknown Group: PT Wanapura Agraraksa, Unknown Group: PT Inti Palm Sumatra, Unknown Group: PT Artanusa Agrindo, Unknown Group: PT Multidaya Fortuna, Unknown Group: PT Sumber Madu Bukari

Additional Cases Identified Using Filtered GLAD Alerts: Unknown Group: Formerly Ekran Bhd, Unknown Group: PT Bumi Tani Jaya, Unknown Group: PT Fliel Green Power,Unknown Group: PT Sumber Rahmat Sentosa, Mulia Sawit Group: PT Persada Era Agro Kencana, Anglo-Eastern Plantations: PT Kahayan Agro Plantation, Unknown: PT Kayan Plantation, Samling: LPF/0007 Samling Jelalong (OP), Samling: LPF/0007 Jelalong OP (Glenealy) Part 1, Double Dynasty: Mutiara Pelita Genaan Plantation Sdn, Bhd Samling: LPF/0006 Samling Lana

Sources for supply chain information: 

Supply chain information included in Rapid Response reports is based on latest publicly versions of mill disclosures and grievance logs. Mighty Earth encourages companies to send updated versions of mill disclosures as soon as they become available and any decision to suspend supplies with a given group/company listed in those mill disclosures; please send to [email protected].

View Report PDF


Palm Oil: Report 18

Rapid Response Monitoring System

Palm Oil, Report 18 | August 2019 

Prepared with support from MapHubs

VIew as PDF

New Cases: Unknown Group: Cambridge Alliance Sdn Bhd, Unknown Group: KUD Restu Bersama, Lee Ling Timber Group: Lima Jaya Timber Sdn Bhd (Limbang), Lee Ling Timber Group: Lima Jaya Timber Sdn Bhd (LPF/0038 – part 2), Pelita Holdings Sdn Bhd: Pelita Holdings Sdn Bhd (LCDA-OT/9137), First Borneo Group: PT Berkah Sawit Abadi, Unknown Group: Selangor Oil Palm Industries Corporation Sdn Bhs, Unknown Group: Telliana Enterprise Sdn Bhd, Unknown Group: Titanium Management Sdn Bhd (Part 1), Unknown Group: Titanium Management Sdn Bhd (Part 2), Unknown Group: PT Wanapura Agraraksa, Unknown Group: PT Inti Palm Sumatra, Unknown Group: PT Artanusa Agrindo, Unknown Group: PT Multidaya Fortuna, Unknown Group: PT Sumber Madu Bukari

Additional Cases Identified Using Filtered GLAD Alerts: PT Sawit Sumbermas Sarana Tbk: PT Sawit Mandiri Lestari, Mulia Sawit Group: PT Persada Era Agro Kencana, Unknown Group: PT Kayan Plantation, Yuwang Group: Empresa (M) Sdn Bhd (OT/0351), Shin Yang: Dataran Linau OP (SY) (Lot 1 Block 14 Murum LD), Woodman Group: Woodman Group (Adong Estate, part of LPF/0004), Woodman Group: Woodman Group (Liku Estate, part of LPF/0004), Double Dynasty: Hua Seng Plantation Sdn Bhd, Asian Agri (RGE): PT Usaha Sawit Unggul, Unknown Group: PT Agro Lintas Nusantara, First Borneo Group: PT Wahana Hamparan Hijau, Double Dynasty: Mutiara Pelita Genaan Plantation Sdn Bhd, Samling: LPF/0006 Samling Lana, Samling: LPF/0007 Samling Jelalong (OP), Samling: LPF/0007 Jelalong OP (Glenealy) Part 1, Pundi Group: PT Pinang Witmas Abadi, Henan Jiujiu Chemical Co. Ltd: PT Palem Segar Lestari, First Borneo Group: PT Borneo Estate Sejahtera, TH Plantations Bhd: Ladang Tabung Haji, Anglo-Eastern Plantations: PT Kahayan Agro Plantation, Salim/IndoGunta: PT Rimbun Sawit Papua, Pactra Group: PT Arjuna Utama Sawit (area 1), Pactra Group: PT Arjuna Utama Sawit (area 2)

Sources for supply chain information: https://bit.ly/2MfYZo6 

Supply chain information included in Rapid Response reports is based on latest publicly versions of mill disclosures and grievance logs. Mighty Earth encourages companies to send updated versions of mill disclosures as soon as they become available and any decision to suspend supplies with a given group/company listed in those mill disclosures; please send to [email protected].


Deforestation Continues Because Companies Aren't Trying

A new assessment released by Climate Focus has found that an area of tree cover the size of the United Kingdom was lost every year between 2014 and 2018. The assessment suggests that achieving the 2020 New York Declaration on Forests targets is now likely impossible. In response to the new report, Mighty Earth CEO Glenn Hurowitz released the following statement:

"Forests are burning in large measure because the big companies that committed to save them are not actually trying to do so. Companies like Ahold Delhaize, McDonald’s, and Mars are, despite all their pledges, continuing to do business on a vast scale with the very companies most responsible for this deforestation, such as Cargill and JBS. Not only are these companies directly financing deforestation, they have repeatedly lobbied governments to stop basic environmental protections. Nobody doing business with Cargill and JBS can credibly say they are concerned about deforestation.

"The tragedy of these findings is that they also demonstrate that success is possible. Companies can achieve dramatic progress when they actually make an effort. These same companies have largely, though imperfectly, enforced their no deforestation polices in the palm oil industry, and the results on the ground show it: deforestation for palm oil has declined from 1 million acres a year to 200,000 acres per year. This is, of course, still 200,000 acres of deforestation too many, but it also shows real progress is possible."

Additional resources:

 


The Endangered Tapanuli Orangutan Loses an Ally

Read in Bahasa

Statement on recent MoU between NSHE and PanEco in the name of Tapanuli Orangutan

The stage is set for a crucial showdown in a long-running battle to save a rare species of orangutan from possible extinction at the hands of a planned US$ 1.6 billion hydroelectric dam project. The controversy over construction of the internationally-financed dam and hydroelectric project centers around findings by scientists that the development will pose an existential threat to the already diminished population of the Tapanuli orangutan (Pongo Tapanuliensis), which has been declared as Critically Endangered by International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN), and also negatively impact thousands of Indonesian citizens of local communities.

However, the dam company has consistently ignored the urgent warnings of scientists that alternatives are needed, putting the decision in the hands of President Jokowi.  Indonesian and international environmental groups are working to protect the orangutan, including Orangutan Information Centre (OIC) dan Center of Orangutan Protection (COP), and Mighty Earth.

Surprisingly, a press release said that NSHE has sealed a deal with the Swiss organization PanEco to greenwash the dam project. The Swiss organization had previously identified the dam as “the greatest threat to the long-term future of the Tapanuli orangutan.” This new arrangement has raised many questions among NGOs, both local and international.

Glenn Hurowitz, CEO Mighty Earth, expressed his disappointment: “It’s a disgrace that PanEco capitulated to bullying and intimidation by the dam company instead of reporting these attempts to the Anti-Corruption Commission (KPK) and police. Indonesian and Swiss authorities should investigate this dirty deal and hold the dam company accountable for its actions. PanEco’s greenwashing shouldn’t obscure the fact that according to the dam company’s own Environmental Impact Statement, this dam is planned for a place with almost three times the density of Tapanuli orangutans than the average in the Batang Toru ecosystem.”

PanEco’s decision to accept the deal offered by NSHE should prompt further investigation since PanEco suddenly altered its approach under pressure.

Until very recently, PanEco’s own website said that “A newly planned hydro-electric dam along the Batang-Toru-river is the greatest threat to the long term future of the Tapanuli orangutan. The hydro dam is planned in an area with the highest density of orangutans and highest biodiversity values of the whole ecosystem. Some 10% of the Tapanuli orangutans reside in the area. The construction of this hydrodam and related infrastructure, powerlines and associated land speculation will cause severe fragmentation of the rainforest and isolation of sub-populations of the Tapanuli orangutan, making them prone to extinction.”

Screenshot of PanEco website (Aug. 24, 2019)

PanEco wrote that the solution was clear: "The construction of the dam needs to be stopped, the whole area must be protected and effective corridors between the two blocks have to be built."

“The facts haven’t changed, and this dam remains a massive threat to the survival of this species. This dirty deal also doesn’t hide the fact that the dam is entirely unnecessary and that the expansion of the nearby Sarulla Geothermal Plant could provide significantly more zero carbon electricity than the Batang Toru dam without threatening the survival of the Tapanuli orangutan. The Indonesian government should investigate the integrity of the decision-making process that allowed the permitting of a clearly inferior project,” said Hurowitz.

The deal is the latest salvo in a long struggle to protect Batang Toru and the endangered Orangutan habitat. A 2018 biology journal article by Sean Sloan, Jatna Supriatna, Mason J. Campbell, Mohammed Alamgir, and William F. Laurance said that “the proposed hydroelectric project should be cancelled. This project would alter at least 8% (96 km²) of high-quality orangutan habitat by 2022).”

“We hope President Jokowi will continue his efforts to protect 'Wonderful Indonesia' and fight against corruption by stopping this dam. He has an opportunity to protect an Indonesian national treasure while supporting the construction of truly green infrastructure,” said Hurowitz.


Ekosistem Batang Toru Semakin Terancam

Pernyataan sikap atas kesepakatan baru antara NSHE dengan PanEco yang mengatasnamakan perlindungan Orangutan Tapanuli

Sudah dipastikan akan terjadi pertikaian panjang demi menyelamatkan spesies orangutan langka yang baru saja ditemukan dari kepunahan di tangan proyek waduk seharga 1.6 juta US Dollar yang dibangun oleh PT. North Sumatera Hydro Energy (NSHE). Proyek kontroversi yang didanai oleh pihak luar negeri memunculkan banyak polemik di tengah temuan dari para ahli bahwa pembangunan tersebut dapat mengakibatkan hilangnya populasi Orangutan Tapanuli (Pongo Tapanuliensis), yang telah ditetapkan oleh International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUNC) sangat langka (critically endangered). Belum ditambah sederet ancaman bencana lingkungan yang diprediksi akan terjadi akibat perubahan ekosistem, dari gempa bumi hingga ancaman sosial ekonomi masyarakat terdampak.

Bagaimanapun, perusahaan terus mengabaikan peringatan darurat yang diberikan para ahli dan menyerahkan keputusan pada Presiden Jokowi. Organisasi lokal maupun internasional telah melakukan berbagai macam protes untuk melindungi Orangutan, salah satunya Orangutan Information Centre (OIC) dan Center of Orangutan Protection (COP), and Mighty Earth.

Baru-baru ini secara mengejutkan muncul sebuah siaran pers yang mengatakan bahwa  terdapat kesepakatan antara NSHE dan PanEco, salah satu LSM asal Swiss yang sebelumnya menyatakan proyek tersebut sebagai “ancaman terbesar jangka Panjang dari Orangutan Tapanuli”. Tentu saja kesepakatan tersebut memunculkan banyak pertanyaan di kalangan organisasi lingkungan baik lokal maupun internasional.

Glenn Hurowitz, CEO Mighty Earth, menyatakan kekecewaannya, “Ini cukup memalukan bagaimana akhirnya PanEco menyerah atas intimidasi alih-alih melaporkan tindakan perusahaan tersebut ke KPK maupun polisi. Pihak berwenang di Indonesia dan Swiss harus segera menginvestigasi kesepakatan kotor ini dan menuntut NSHE untuk bertanggung jawab atas apa yang telah mereka lakukan di ekosistem Batang Toru. Sikap PanEco atas kesepakatan yang seolah-olah melindungi lingkungan ini seharusnya tidak mengaburkan fakta bahawa menurut Analisis Dampak Lingkungan (AMDAL) yang dimiliki NSHE, proyek PLTA tersebut dibangun di tempat dengan kepadatan hampir tiga kali lipat dibandingkan dengan rata-rata di ekosistem Batang Toru.”

Sikap yang ditunjukan PanEco dengan menerima tawaran NSHE perlu diteliti lebih lanjut karena selama ini PanEco konsistem dalam komitmen menjaga ekosistem Batang Toru. Masih tertera jelas dalam websitenya bahwa pembangunan PLTA di lokasi tersebut menjadi ancaman jangka panjang terbesar bagi kelangsungan hidup Orangutan Tapanuli.

“PLTA yang sedang dibangun baru-baru ini di sepanjang sungai Batang Toru merupakan ancaman jangka Panjang terbesar bagi Orangutan Tapanuli. Proyek tersebut dicanangkan di area dengan kepadatan Orangutan tertinggi dan biodiversity yang sangat berharga dari seluruh ekosistem. Sekitar 10% dari Orangutan tinggal di area tersebut. Konstruksi dari PLTA dan infrastruktur terkaitnya, jalur listrik, dan spekulasi lahan yang terkait akan mengakibatkan fragmentasi cukup parah dari hutan hujan dan mengisolasi populasi Orangutan Tapanuli, membuatnya rentan punah,” Bahkan PanEco merumuskan rekomendasi sebagai respon atas ditemukannya species langka tersebut yakni mengentikan pembangunan bendungan, seluruh area dilindungi dan koridor yang menyambungkan habitat antara blok barat dan timur perlu segera dibangun.

“Fakta-fakta tersebut belum berubah dan PLTA ini adalah ancaman besar bagi Orangutan Tapanuli yang masih tersisa. Kesepakatan kotor ini juga tidak menyembunyikan fakta bahwa proyek tersebut tidaklah diperlukan mengingat Sumatera masih memiliki Sarulla Geothermal yang dapat ditingkatkan kapasitasnya dan mampu menyediakan listrik dengan mengurangi karbon secara signifikan tanpa menganggu habitat Orangutan Tapanuli. Pemerintah Indonesia perlu menginvestigasi lebih dalam atas integritas proses pembuatan keputusan yang mengijinkan proyek tersebut,” lanjut Glenn.

Kesepakatan tersebut menodai perjuangan perlindungan ekosistem di Batang Toru khususnya habitat Orangutan Tapanuli yang terancam punah. Banyak studi dari para ahli lingkungan yang menyatakan bahwa proyek tersebut dianggap mengecilkan dampak kerusakan lingkungan, ekosistem serta masyarakat sekitar sungai. Diantaranya tercantum dalam sebuah artikel yang ditulis oleh beberapa ilmuwan Sean Sloan, Jatna Supriatna, Mason J. Campbell, Mohammed Alamgir, dan William F. Laurance dalam jurnal biologi pada tahun 2018 lalu, “Pada akhirnya, proyek PLTA yang diajukan seharusnya dibatalkan. Proyek tersebut akan merubah setidaknya 8% (96 km²) dari habitat Orangutan yang berkualitas di tahun 2022 nanti. Maka kami sangat tidak menyarankan proyek ini untuk dilanjutkan.”

Namun di tengah ancaman bahaya yang disuarakan oleh para pegiat lingkungan, proyek pembangunan terus berjalan dan diperkirakan selesai tahun 2022. Di lain sisi, yang mereka tentang bukanlah proyek yang digadang-gadang sebagai bagian dari Program Prioritas Nasional Ketenagalistrikan 35.000 MW dan penghematan negara di berbagai sektor. Namun masalah utama yang perlu diingat oleh semua pihak adalah lokasi yang akan sangat berdampak buruk terhadap lingkungan di masa depan.

“Kami harap Presiden Jokowi akan melanjutkan usahanya untuk menjaga ‘Wonderful Indonesia’, mendukung dan berjuang memerangi korupsi dengan menghentikan proyek PLTA Batang Toru untuk melindungi kekayaan bangsa dan mendukung infrastruktur ramah lingkungan,” tutup Glenn.(*)

 

Informasi lebih lanjut, silakan hubungi :

Image Dynamics - Ayunda Putri - [email protected]


Korindo Threatens Legal Action to Bury the Truth

Palm oil and timber conglomerate sends Forest Stewardship Council a “cease and desist” letter the day it was scheduled to release findings from two-year investigation into the company’s wrongdoing

JAKARTA – Forest Stewardship Council (FSC), a global certification body for responsible forest management, was scheduled to release summaries of its investigatory findings from a two-year investigation into the Korindo Group, a notorious Korean-Indonesian logging and palm oil conglomerate, on September 5, 2019. However, Mighty Earth was notified by FSC that it has indefinitely delayed the publication of its findings after receiving dubious legal threats from Korindo, including the apparent delivery of a "cease and desist" letter.

"Korindo is using the threat of legal action to bury the FSC's findings and suppress evidence of its wrongdoing," said Mighty Earth Senior Campaign Director Deborah Lapidus. "These are not the actions of an innocent party. Korindo's willing embrace of bullying tactics is proof they have something to hide."

The investigation, prompted by a complaint filed by Mighty Earth, concluded that Korindo had flouted the FSC's 'Policy for Association' by violating indigenous peoples' rights, carrying out significant conversion of natural forests, and destroying significant areas of High Conservation Value (HCVs).

Yet, for years Korindo has been using the FSC's prestigious eco-forestry label to greenwash its destructive practices. Korindo sells its timber, plywood, pulpwood, biomass, and newsprint to customers such as Asia Pulp & Paper (Indonesia), APRIL (Indonesia), Sumitomo Forestry (Japan), Oji Corporation (Japan), Marubeni (Japan), and News Corps Australia.

As a result of Korindo's violations of FSC standards, the FSC imposed a series of measures on the company to improve its practices and address its liabilities for the severe damages it caused. These conclusions were announced in July 2019. According to the FSC statement, Korindo will be required to continue its suspension of any forest conversion and deforestation, achieve FSC certification in all its forestry operations and to comply with the principle of FPIC [Free Prior and Informed Consent]. Korindo is also required to assess past negative impact and secure remedy for it. Furthermore, the FSC says it will disassociate Korindo if it fails to adhere to these requirements.

"Instead of acknowledging its wrongdoing and taking responsibility for its actions, Korindo chose to spin the conclusions of the FSC investigation and proclaim its innocence in the press. If Korindo wants the truth to be known about what the FSC found, it should call on FSC to release the full findings of its investigations – as we have done – so that the public can see the truth for themselves," said Lapidus. "But instead, Korindo is trying to intimidate FSC into silence, as it has attempted to do with Mighty Earth and many of our NGO partners."

"There is no justification for FSC's complicity in covering up Korindo's wrongdoing. It needs to stop doing the dirty work of deforesters and start acting like a sustainability organization," Lapidus added.

“We urge the FSC to stand strong and proceed with releasing the full findings of the investigations, as they are required to do by their own procedures. Do not give in to Korindo's gangster-style threats,” said Mighty Earth Campaign Director and FSC expert Phil Aikman. "Korindo's customers deserve to know the truth about the origins of their purportedly sustainable products. The indigenous people who have suffered at the hands of this nefarious conglomerate deserve to see Korindo held accountable and to be fairly compensated. And the public has the right to know just how much precious rainforest was destroyed."

"We call on the FSC to suspend Korindo, as the company is acting in obvious bad faith and is clearly not ready to accept its liabilities,” Aikman concluded.

Mighty Earth’s call for accountability and transparency was echoed by community organizations working in Papua.

Franky Samperante of Yayasan Pusaka, which works to defend indigenous land rights in Papua said, "We got the complaints from the victims that are impacted by logging and palm oil company, subsidiary company of Korindo Group. Land, forest and sago hamlet which are their food resources and livelihood are being destroyed. The river as the clean water supply has been contaminated by plant waste and pesticides. Their rights and power over their own land moved unwittingly. Indigenous people and workers are subjected to violence and intimidation threats."

"Korindo is also not taking its corporate social responsibility seriously," said Pastor Anselmus Amo from SKP-KAMe Meruake, a Papuan human rights organization. "FSC should consult directly with affected communities to better understand Korindo’s egregious actions and the communities’ views on what fair compensation and remediation measures would be. We stand ready to help resolve this long standing conflict."

Samperante added, "For over decades, Korindo has gotten away with violating indigenous peoples’ land rights without exposure, while selling itself in the media as a savior to the Papuan people. Korindo should be seriously committed to respect and recover our rights and protect local environment."

***
Further information, please contact:

Alex Armstrong
Mighty Earth
[email protected]

Ayunda Putri
Image Dynamics
[email protected]


Global Day of Action for the Amazon

Global Day of Action for the Amazon

On September 5, activists across the world joined the Global Day of Action for the Amazon to hold governments and companies that stand to profit from the fires in the Amazon accountable for their role in this environmental destruction.

Minneapolis, Minnesota


In Minneapolis, Mighty Earth and 80+ activists rallied at the Minneapolis Institute of Art–home to the Cargill Gallery–to call out Cargill for its role in lighting up the Amazon and polluting water sources. Holding banners such as “Cargill: there’s no art on a dead planet” and “Cargill: helping the world burn” activists from the Twin Cities gathered outside the museum’s main doors.

Use left and right arrows to view all navigate

Midway through the protest, while chanting “The Amazon’s in flames, we’re out in force and naming names protestors” protestors abandoned their spot on the front sidewalk and swarmed into the main entrance of the museum, where they proceeded to stage a dramatic die-in.

The protest was endorsed by over a dozen local, national, and international organizations, including the Twin Cities Democratic Socialists of America chapter, Environment Minnesota, and Rainforest Action Network, as well as by Bill McKibben. Outlets such as Fox 9 and City Pages covered the event.

Cargill went into damage control mode and rapidly issued a comment in an attempt to defend the company’s reputation. In response, Mighty Earth CEO Glenn Hurowitz released the following statement:

“Cargill gives up the game immediately by declaring their opposition is to ‘illegal deforestation.’ What that actually means is that they are still going to take full advantage of lax regulations and enforcement in Bolsonaro-era Brazil. A commitment to oppose illegal deforestation is nothing more than a pledge to obey the law – this is the bare minimum, not something to celebrate.

“The fires in the Amazon are a byproduct of the rollback of safeguards for the environment and Indigenous peoples in both Bolivia and Brazil. These policies have been implemented at the behest of the region’s industrial agriculture sector, of which Cargill is a top player. We have applauded Cargill for joining the Amazon Moratorium in the past, but since that time they have fallen dramatically behind the industry by refusing to go beyond that single safeguard.

“The Moratorium protects only the Brazilian Amazon, but enables Cargill to continue buying from deforesters in the Cerrado or the Bolivian Amazon, where more than 2.5 million acres have burned, largely to clear land for new cattle and soy animal feed plantations, in just a few weeks. By failing to address these issues and others, Cargill has contributed to the atmosphere of lawlessness in Brazil and beyond that has led to these fires.

“These fires are also exposing a loophole in the existing Soy Moratorium. While broadly effective, it does permit soy producers to engage in extensive deforestation for cattle and still sell their soy to Cargill. The Amazon crisis shows the urgent need to close this loophole so that deforestation can be stopped, whatever crop is driving it.

“In addition, the forest fires in Brazil and Bolivia are a result of land being burned to clear it for cattle. Ranchers will then move cattle from existing land to the newly deforested land, and plant soy to sell to Cargill. As long as Cargill keeps providing this incentive, the burning will continue.”

Washington D.C.


Mighty Earth also co-organized sister actions in Washington, D.C. and Atlanta. In D.C., protestors marched from the White House to the building that houses both the Brazilian consulate and the local Cargill office. Campaign director Lucia von Reusner was featured as a speaker at the D.C. protest, where she spoke about the role of large agribusinesses in driving and incentivizing the fires. “It is no surprise that Cargill is headquartered in the same building as the Brazilian consulate, given that our satellite investigations of the most recent fires raging across Brazil and Bolivia have found Cargill and mega beef supplier JBS consistently at the front lines of this deforestation” von Reusner said, addressing the large crowd gathered on the sidewalk.

Use left and right arrows to navigate


International Day of Action for the Amazon: Global Community Sets Stage for Climate Week

Today, concerned citizens across six continents – from Hong Kong to Washington and Paris to Pretoria – will take action for the Amazon by protesting the ongoing fires and deforestation. In a show of international solidarity with indigenous leaders, activists around the world are standing up to President Jair Bolsonaro's reckless policies and the international corporations profiting off environmental destruction.

The burning of the Amazon and the darkening of skies have captured the world’s conscience. But while much of the blame for the fires has rightly fallen on President Bolsonaro for directly encouraging the burning of forests and the seizure of Indigenous Peoples’ lands, the incentive for the destruction comes from large-scale international meat and soy animal feed companies like JBS, Marfrig, and Cargill, according to a recent Mighty Earth report.

Additional research from media and advocacy organizations has helped identify a group of 12 companies responsible for the ongoing deforestation and destruction in the Amazon. This “Dirty Dozen” covers the financing of projects causing deforestation, the traders who help create the market for commodities like soy and beef that are linked to deforestation, and the retailers who sell the resulting products to unsuspecting consumers.

As part of the International Day of Action, Mighty Earth and nearly 100 allied groups – including Amazon Watch, Sierra Club, Rainforest Action Network, Extinction Rebellion, Natural Resources Defense Council, Friends of the Earth, SumOfUs, Center for Biological Diversity, Endangered Species Coalition, Canopée, CARE Canada, Rettet den Regenwald, Danmarks Naturfredningsforening, International Accountability Project, Native Forest Council, Humane League, and others – have sent letters to the CEOs of these 12 companies outlining the steps they must take to end their role in incentivizing destruction of the Amazon and other fragile ecosystems.

Read the letters to Big Finance and Mega Retailers here.

Today’s actions also set the stage for Climate Week in New York City (September 23-29).

“Companies like Cargill, Ahold Delhaize, and others have previously used Climate Week as an opportunity for splashy announcements and feel-good pledges,” Mighty Earth CEO Glenn Hurowitz said. “But after years of failing to deliver on these promises, their words ring hollow. This Climate Week will mark five years since the signing of the New York Declaration on Forests, and one year left until their original 2020 deadline. The Amazon is on fire, the climate crisis is worsening, and the world cannot afford dithering and excuses any longer. These companies must take decisive action now.”

Background materials


Companies Support Higher Cocoa Prices for Farmers

Companies Support Higher Cocoa Prices for Farmers

Mighty Earth collected statements from industry with varying level of support for the much-needed price increase for cocoa to protect farmers. While we do not in any way endorse these statements, they serve to debunk the notion that industry will not support a price increase.

We call on companies which have yet to publicly commit to paying a better price –  such as Nestle, Sucden, Fuji Oils, and Pladis – to do so forthwith.

We hope this encourages other producer countries to set a price floor, like Cameroon, Nigeria, Indonesia, Ecuador, Brazil, and Peru. We ask all producer countries’ cocoa regulatory bodes to commit to ensuring all cocoa farmers earn a living income, worldwide.

Efforts must not be limited to supporting Côte d’Ivoire and Ghana but must aim at ensuring a minimum price for cocoa farmers across the globe.


Barry Callebaut: “It is the execution on this topic, which matters tremendously. It is a fact that the floor price will be implemented by the Ghanaian and Ivorian government. We agree to that principle, but next to the opportunities there are risks. The Barry Callebaut statement is a reflection of the conditions that have to be fulfilled in order for the floor price to have the intended results for farmers, and not lead to further deforestation.” “As the biggest buyer of cocoa in the world we welcome the initiative of the Ivory Coast and Ghana governments to support cocoa farmer income. We are therefore already working with the government and other companies to have a smooth implementation of the living income differential. We remain committed to continue to lead on sustainability as defined by our Forever Chocolate objectives and this does not change, if anything continues to gather momentum. All this does not preclude the fact that in the living income differential discussions there has been little space to embrace much needed discussions on some potential risks highlighted on sustainability. This does not diminish our commitment to sustainability but our responsibility as a sustainable operator focused on impact is to highlight challenges of a changing environment.”


Blommer: “Recently, the Governments of Ghana and Cote d’Ivoire engaged the cocoa and chocolate industry in a series of meetings to discuss options around new pricing structures aimed at providing cocoa farmers greater value for their cocoa. Blommer believes that cocoa farmers should earn sufficient income to ensure a decent standard of living. Through our Sustainable Origins platform we are working closely with producing governments, farmer organizations, and other development partners on many initiatives to catalyze the transformation of traditional farms into diversified, sustainable, and profitable businesses. These efforts are also necessary to boost farmer income but they may not be enough without increased remuneration to farmers for their crop. We therefore support the overall goal of the governments of Côte d’Ivoire and Ghana to increase farmer remuneration. Developing new and innovative methods to achieve this should remain a priority while maintaining a continued focus on the critical work being done under the industry’s sustainability activities. We look forward to our continued partnership and collaboration with Côte d’Ivoire and Ghana to ensure a sustainable and thriving cocoa sector – where farmers prosper, cocoa-growing communities are empowered, human rights are respected, and the environment is conserved.”


Cargill: “Cargill s’engage de manière durable auprès des agriculteurs et de gouvernements ivoiriens et ghanéens. Chez Cargill (www.Cargill.com), nous partageons l’ambition, exprimée par les gouvernements de la Côte d’Ivoire et du Ghana, d’améliorer le revenu des producteurs de cacao et d’assurer la durabilité à long terme du secteur. Nous saluons la volonté des deux gouvernements, d’établir un prix plancher minimum pour les fèves de cacao et affirmons notre engagement à faire davantage pour veiller à ce que cette mesure permette d’accroitre de façon durable les revenus des agriculteurs. Nous sommes impatients de collaborer étroitement avec le Conseil Café Cacao et le Cocobod afin de réaliser des changements positifs fondamentaux dans le secteur du cacao.” [Unofficial translation: Cargill is making a long-term commitment to Ivorian and Ghanaian farmers and governments. At Cargill (www.Cargill.com), we share the ambition of the governments of Côte d’Ivoire and Ghana to improve the income of cocoa farmers and ensure the long-term sustainability of the sector. We applaud the willingness of both governments to set a minimum floor price for cocoa beans and affirm our commitment to do more to ensure that this measure leads to sustainable increases in farmers’ incomes. We look forward to working closely with the Coffee Cocoa Council and Cocobod to achieve fundamental positive changes in the cocoa sector.]


ECOM: “ECOM welcomes any initiative working towards ensuring a decent standard of living for cocoa farmers. We look forward to our continued discussions with the Conseil Café Cacao of Côte d’Ivoire, Cocobod of Ghana and other industry players to ensure a sustainable and thriving cocoa sector. We are currently awaiting additional information that will be shared by the two governments regarding details of the mechanism.”


Fair Trade: on the 1st of October 2019, Fairtrade is raising its Minimum Price for conventional cocoa to $2,400 per metric ton, and is raising its Premium for Fairtrade cocoa to $240 per metric ton. For organic cocoa, the Fairtrade Minimum Price will be $2,700. As of this writing, and Unlike UTZ/Rainforest Alliance, Fairtrade is the only certification scheme with a global mandatory minimum price (although it still falls short of the Fair Trade Living Income Reference Price). When the market price rises higher than the Fairtrade Minimum Price, producers will receive market prices.


Ferrero: “Ferrero welcomes any efforts of the governments of Ivory Coast and Ghana to relieve cocoa farmer poverty as we believe that cocoa farmers should earn sufficient income to ensure a decent standard of living. Any efforts should also tackle the broader development challenges in cocoa growing communities, including child labor and deforestation.”


Godiva: “GODIVA supports any efforts to lift cocoa growing communities in Cote d’Ivoire and Ghana out of poverty, and protect the future of cocoa farming and farmers.”


Halba: “We fully support the new floor price announced by Ghana and Côte d’Ivoire. The payment of such a price is already a great step forward.” We would appreciate it very much, if at least 70 – 80% of that price would reach the farmer.


Hershey: “At Hershey, we have long supported initiatives that improve the livelihoods of farmers. Cocoa farmers should be able to support their families and earn a decent standard of living and we support the goal of raising farmer incomes. Hershey, along with the entire industry, will be working with these governments to further understand their proposals to increase farmer incomes. Any plans would need to be implemented carefully to ensure they do not create imbalances in the long-term supply of cocoa that could result in surpluses and destabilize the market, which ultimately hurts farmers. The plans also need to guard against new production on protected forest land. We want to work together with the governments to see an increased share of the global cocoa price transferred to farmers through the government-regulated farmgate price. These are complicated, but important issues. We look forward to joining with the rest of the industry to continue these discussions with the governments and other partners to improve the livelihoods of cocoa farmers and the sustainability of cocoa farming long into the future.”


Lindt & Sprüngli: “Our sustainable cocoa program – the Lindt & Sprüngli Farming Program – aims at decent and resilient livelihoods of todays and future cocoa farmers and their families. While increased farm gate prices are an important measure to improve livelihoods, we follow a holistic approach to increase the net-income of cocoa farming households delivering to us, which includes a sustainable intensification of cocoa cultivation, the creation of additional income sources, a stabilization of cash flow and secured income, as well as the improvement of community infrastructure. Especially Ghana is an important origin for us. We therefore support the Governments’ efforts to contribute to improved cocoa livelihoods, and will follow the developments closely.”


Mars: “U.S. food maker Mars Inc. supports a decision by Ivory Coast and Ghana to set a floor price for their cocoa exports, a senior executive told Reuters on Wednesday, becoming one of the first major chocolate companies to back the initiative. ‘We support moves by governments to intervene to achieve a higher price that leads to a sustainable increase paid to the farmer and is supported with governance to ensure there is no further expansion of land use to grow cocoa,’ Ament said. ‘Initiatives to boost productivity, improvements in social services and infrastructure, and exploration of alternative incomes are necessary, but they will likely not be enough without an increase in the price farmers receive for their crop,’ Ament said.”


Mondelez: “We believe cocoa farmers should earn sufficient income to provide a decent standard of living today as well as to safeguard the sustainable future livelihoods for the cocoa farmers of Côte d’Ivoire and Ghana. With Cocoa Life, our holistic cocoa sustainability program, we work on the ground, with the cocoa farmers and our partners to tackle the complex challenges that cocoa growing communities face. Partnerships are key to creating the right environment for lasting change. We welcome the Ghana and Cote d’Ivoire’s governments’ efforts to address cocoa farmer income through the Living Income Differential as an important building block to achieve a sustainable livelihood from cocoa. We also believe this is a unique opportunity to create the necessary partnerships to ensure the long-term beneficial effect of the new pricing approach and look forward to collaborating with both governments to ensure no further deforestation will take place and human rights will be protected. A sector-wide strategy with coordinated actions by all stakeholders of the value chain is needed to catalyze the transformation of cocoa farming into modern, sustainable, and profitable businesses that provide sustainable livelihoods for cocoa growing families.”


Olam“Olam Cocoa is committed to improving the livelihoods of cocoa farmers and communities, and to preventing forest degradation. We share the ambition of the governments of Côte d’Ivoire and Ghana to establish a pricing structure which guarantees a minimum price for cocoa farmers, and strengthens progress towards a sustainable cocoa supply chain that improves farmer livelihoods and protects forests. You can see more of what we’re doing to tackle farmer poverty and its associated ills, in our last Cocoa Sustainability Report – as of the end of last year we had nearly 230,000 cocoa farmers enrolled in programmes to support their livelihoods, including 43,000 new farmers in 2018.”


Uncommon Cacao: “At Uncommon Cacao, we believe farmer prosperity is a key ingredient in good chocolate. Transparent, sustainable prices for both farmers and exporters that cover costs of production are an important factor in enabling producers to earn at least a living income from their cacao farm. We support country- and context-specific export price floors, as long as they are tied to transparent farmgate price floors, are based on impartial research and cross-sector collaboration, and seek to improve farmer prosperity. We encourage all cacao market actors to always consider these prices as floors and never ceilings. The price floor announced by Ghana and Cote d’Ivoire and the Living Income Differential are key steps towards creating better outcomes for farmers and the industry, but we still see this as just the beginning. Cacao farmer prosperity depends on the commitment of producers, governments, intermediaries and chocolate companies to pay more for cacao and catalyze broader systems change.”


Tony’s Chocolonely: Tony’s Chocolonely exists to change the cocoa industry. Without paying a higher price, the chocolate industry will never solve issues in their supply chain and live up to their commitment in the Harkin Engel Protocol. Chocolate companies should be asked the simple question: How much profit are you willing to take, at the expense of a living income for farmers. Perpetuating extreme poverty, leads to modern slavery, illegal child labour and deforestation. It’s a matter of choice, as simple as that. Tony’s commits to more than just a minimum price. On top of the farmgate price and the Fairtrade premium, we pay an additional premium up to the living income reference price – the new industry benchmark. We pay this higher price as part of our 5 sourcing principles (higher price, strong farmers, productivity and diversification, long term commitments, 100% traceability). And we share our model, knowledge and network viawww.tonysopenchain.com. Tony’s Chocolonely exists to change the inequality in the system and we invite all others to join, cause only together we will make the whole chocolate industry 100% slavefree.

Florence Pradier, secrétaire générale du syndicat français du chocolat: « Nous sommes d’accord pour réduire la pauvreté des planteurs, mais si nous mettons la main à la poche, c’est pour s’assurer qu’au moins 70 % des 2 600 dollars la tonne promis aillent aux planteurs ». [Translation: We agree to reduce the poverty of the planters, but if we put our hands in our pockets, it is to ensure that at least 70% of the $ 2,600 a tonne promised goes to the planters.]


Cemoi:Of course we support minimum price !« Pour notre part, nous partageons l’avis des gouvernements de la Côte d’Ivoire et du Ghana selon lequel le prix du cacao est un facteur déterminant du revenu des planteurs. Nous partageons l’objectif d’une culture plus durable du cacao et soutenons la hausse des prix au planteur et cela va dans le sens de notre programme Transparence Cacao dont l’un des axes principaux est l’amélioration de la qualité de vie du planteur par une rémunération plus juste ».  [Translation: For our part, we share the opinion of the governments of Côte d’Ivoire and Ghana that the price of cocoa is a determining factor in the income of farmers. We share the goal of a more sustainable cocoa crop and support the increase of prices to the planter. This is in line with where our program is headed, called Transparency Cocoa, of which a main focus is improving the quality of life of planters with fairer remuneration.]


The Companies Behind the Burning of the Amazon

The burning of the Amazon and the darkening of skies from Sao Paulo, Brazil, to Santa Cruz, Bolivia, have captured the world’s conscience. Much of the blame for the fires has rightly fallen on Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro for directly encouraging the burning of forests and the seizure of Indigenous Peoples’ lands.

But the incentive for the destruction comes from large-scale international meat and soy animal feed companies like JBS and Cargill, and the global brands like Stop & Shop, Costco, McDonald’s, Walmart/Asda, and Sysco that buy from them and sell to the public. It is these companies that are creating the international demand that finances the fires and deforestation.

New maps and analysis from Mighty Earth, based on data from NASA, CONAB, and Imazon and released here for the first time, show which companies are most closely linked to the burning.

Read the full report, The Companies Behind the Burning of the Amazon in English, Spanish, Italian or French.

Take Action: Tell the companies responsible to stop financing this reckless environmental destruction.


Mighty Earth and NGO's urge the EU to end complicity in the Amazon Fires

Mighty Earth joined today a host of other civil society organizations, pleading the EU to step up to the plate and address its own complicity in current Amazon fires & deforestation crisis. We demanded that the European Commission work on EU regulation to end deforestation once and for all, in order to protect the lungs of the planet.

Our open letter to European heads of state speaks truth to power, affirms that the current destructive fires in Latin America are not natural, are destroying ecosystems and hurting indigenous peoples, that they are triggered largely by soy and beef industries, and that they are made possible by the new Brazilian government’s flawed policies. But most importantly, this communication to the top powers in Europe points out that Europe also bears key responsibility for the fires. European consumption and finance is intimately linked with the current deforestation and fire crisis in Brazil, Bolivia, and neighboring countries.

We are calling on the EU to suspend ratification of the Free Trade Agreement as is and to prepare legislation which will ensure companies and the finance sector do due diligence to guarantee that products placed on the EU market and investments have not led to recent forest degradation or deforestation or caused human rights abuses.

 Read the full letter here.

 


Looking at Opportunities for Sustainability in Rubber

Sustainable Natural Rubber- Pathways, Policies and Partnerships is being held from 24-26 September 2019 hosted by Rainforest Alliance, Mighty Earth, Einhorn Products, Prince of Songkla University, and Earth Net Foundation, Thailand. RSVP here!

Over a decade ago, when I started working with coconut farmers in Ban Krut, Prachuab Khiri Khan, Thailand to develop an organic coconut value chain, many of these farmers also grew rubber. Despite the work on organic coconut, there was no interest or discussion about sustainable or organic rubber. It didn't seem to merit any interest at the time, in part because rubber is not eaten, and also because it needs to be processed with chemicals to yield rubber-based products such as tires and wetsuits.

Today looks very different than 10 years ago. Many key business stakeholders are beginning to understand the need for sustainability in rubber and are adapting their sourcing policies to address this in their supply chains. The newly established Global Platform for Sustainable Natural Rubber is evidence of this and has brought together the largest number of actors from this sector so far. However, end users outside of the tire industry as well as rubber farmers and tappers remain missing voices in the platform. There are other mechanisms today for sustainable rubber as well. Thai organic coconut farmers who also grow rubber can have their latex certified as part of the “Fair Rubber” initiative. The Forest Stewardship Council® (FSC) has taken an early lead in sustainable rubber certification by actively working to engage market players.

These policies and platforms reflect a growing trend of leaders in sustainability looking deeper into their purchasing and supply chains—and this demand is coming from all sides. Consumers want to know more about the brands and products they choose: what it is, where it comes from, and the impact that it has on our planet and its people. Research shows that companies that demonstrate and communicate sustainability leadership in new areas have a clear market advantage, along with other benefits such as secure supply chain, engaged employees, and stakeholder confidence.

This growing interest in more sustainable agricultural and forestry supply chains represents a massive opportunity for positive impact on communities, local watersheds, biodiversity, and national economies. Across commodities, agriculture effects massive areas of land. For rubber alone, over 14 million hectares are cultivated, and there are millions of associated farmers and laborers.

Unless we can link investment in sustainable practices with demand from responsible markets, it is difficult to move toward sustainability or achieve certification. Farmers, particularly small-scale farmers, are on the economic edge, usually laden with substantial debts and facing the constant risks of poor yields and low prices, either of which could lead to failure and bankruptcy. Even without a significant shift in practices, achieving certification adds a cost in time, training, and resources. If major shifts in practices are also needed, this requires an even greater investment and effort.

Much of the initial focus has been on preventing additional deforestation, similar to efforts with oil palm, and these commitments are critically important. However, with low rubber prices in the market for several years now, pressure to clear more land for rubber has been reduced. As such, it is also critically important to look at the management of rubber lands and practices that support biodiversity, watershed and soil health, and carbon sequestration. This must be done alongside consideration of the economics of the supply chain and developing goals that ensure farmers realize financial stability and improved livelihoods through rubber cultivation, regardless of fluctuations in the market and price.

An interesting possibility for improving the ecology and economics of rubber cultivation for farmers lies in exploring how diversity and ecology can be brought back to the millions of hectares that have already been transformed to monoculture. Here we see a huge opportunity, as demonstrated in research from the Prince of Songkla University and the experience of many farmers in Thailand. Both show that rubber can be effectively grown in diverse agroforestry systems to deliver comparable latex yields and much better performance on ecological measures such as erosion, water sequestration, biodiversity, carbon sequestration, and microclimate, while providing beneficial secondary yields of other commodities grown on the same land.  This should not be surprising at all, as the rubber tree’s (Hevea brasiliensis') native habitat is in the most diverse forests of the Amazon.

It is critical that we begin transforming the rubber sector and send signals from the market that there is a demand for sustainability managed rubber farms and latex. This is fundamental to the long-term viability of natural rubber overall, as it is apparent that rubber farmers, like many types of farmers, are an aging population. Many farmers do not want or expect any of their children to farm and tap rubber. This perspective is not overly surprising given the low returns and difficult work of rubber cultivation. In addition, the job of a rubber tapper is not always seen as reputable work. These factors can have a negative impact on the future supply of natural rubber, despite the expected growth in market demand for rubber. We have a massive opportunity to improve the livelihoods and labor conditions for rubber tappers, to introduce new methods of management and technologies to improve yields, and to make rubber tapping a more sought-after job.

In truth, we are just starting this exploration for natural rubber and many other solutions are still yet to be developed.   When the key actors and supporters of value chains from farmers to processors, from enterprises to final consumers, work together, and when government agencies and NGOs help facilitate the right environment and provide key support where needed, the potential for rapid and dramatic shifts towards sustainability or even the step beyond sustainability—to regeneration—is frankly amazing.

It is not clear where we will go, but in the next decade we can and will dramatically shift the natural rubber value chain and its impact on our planet to be far more sustainable. If you would like to join us in exploring this potential and discussing some of the solutions proposed at a multi-stakeholder dialogue taking place near some of the most interesting sustainable rubber farming innovation in Hat Yai, Thailand, please contact Margaret Kran-Annexstein ([email protected]).

Michael B. Commons,  Earth Net Foundation, Thailand

 


340+ organisations call on the EU to immediately halt trade negotiations with Brazil

In an open letter, over 340 civil society organisations are demanding that the European Union immediately halt free trade agreement negotiations with the Mercosur bloc (Brazil, Argentina, Paraguay and Uruguay) on the grounds of deteriorating human rights and environmental conditions in Brazil. The letter is addressed to presidents of the EU institutions ahead of the ministerial-level meeting next week in Brussels where EU and Mercosur foreign ministers aim to finalise the negotiations. 

Download the PDF version of the letter here.

German version of the letter (PDF) – French version of the letter – Spanish version – Portuguese version

” Dear President of the European Council, President of the European Commission, President of the European Parliament,

We, the undersigned civil society organizations, are writing to call on the European Union to use its influence to prevent a worsening human rights and environmental situation in Brazil.

In April, more than 600 European scientists and two Brazilian Indigenous organizations, representing 300 Brazilian Indigenous groups, called for the EU to act as a global leader in supporting human rights, human dignity and a habitable climate by making sustainability the cornerstone of its trade negotiations with Brazil. We fully support this call.

Bound by the Treaty of the European Union, the EU and its Member States vowed to respect and promote human rights as an overarching objective in its dealings with other countries. Trade Commissioner Cecilia Malmström has also clearly stated the need for new EU trade agreements to deliver sustainable development.

Since the inauguration of Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro in January 2019, we have witnessed increased human rights violations, attacks on minorities, indigenous peoples, LGBTQ and other traditional communities. Moreover, the administration continues to threaten the basic democratic functioning of civil society while instigating a fundamental assault on some of the world’s most precious and ecologically valuable regions.

We are deeply concerned about the following:

  • Indigenous lands demarcation has been put under the jurisdiction of the Agriculture Ministry, paving the way for powerful cattle and soy agribusinesses to accelerate their sweep through the Amazon, the world’s largest tropical forest and the Cerrado, the world’s most biodiverse savannah. Though this controversial measure appears to have been temporarily reversed in May by the Brazilian Senate, President Bolsonaro may still veto it.
  • There has been a dramatic increase in attacks on Indigenous people, other traditional communities and their territories. In February, at least 14 protected Indigenous territories were reported to be under attack from invaders. In addition, the government abolished more than 35 national councils of social participation. Attacks on people defending their territories or natural resources are on the rise in rural Brazil, resulting in increasing deaths of community leaders, peasants and activists.
  • Bolsonaro’s campaign promise of “ending any form of activism” was implemented on his first day in office, empowering the government to “supervise, coordinate, monitor and observe the activities and actions of international agencies and non-governmental organisations within national territory.”
  • Both the Environment Ministry and the Foreign Affairs Ministry are now led by deniers of global warming, leading to the abolishment of departments responsible for climate change. Even as Brazil remains a signatory to the Paris Agreement on climate change, it is becoming unlikely that the administration will take the necessary measures to implement the agreement.
  • Socio-environmental legislation and policies have been dramatically weakened during the first 100 days of the new government. The Forest Code has been undermined with new measures proposing the reduction of legal reserves and a more flexible deadline for land regularization by landgrabbers. In January 2019, deforestation in the Amazon reportedly rose by 54 percent compared to the same period in 2018.

Civil society actors, activists, peasants, workers and minorities face extreme dangers from the incendiary rhetoric of the Bolsonaro government and its supporters. This includes his labeling of members of grassroots movements like the Landless Workers Movement and the Movement of Homeless as “terrorists,” generating concerns that Brazil’s controversial anti-terrorist law will be used to criminalize social activists.

The EU is Brazil’s second-largest trading partner overall, second-largest importer of Brazilian soy and a major importer of Brazilian beef and other agricultural products. The EU, therefore, has a responsibility to address human rights and environmental injustices taking place in Brazil under the Bolsonaro government. It must use its leverage to support civil society, human rights and the environment.

The EU is in the midst of negotiating a far-reaching Mercosur trade deal that seeks to expand market access and trade between the two regions, including Brazil. It is imperative that the EU sends an unequivocal message to President Bolsonaro that the EU will refuse to negotiate a trade deal with Brazil until there is an end to human rights violations, strict measures to end further deforestation and concrete commitments to implement the Paris Agreement.

In the past, the EU has suspended trade preferences with countries involved in human rights violations, such as Myanmar and the Philippines. In addition, the EU has restricted imports of products whose production is related to human rights in the case of conflict minerals. It is time that the EU takes a similar, tough stance to prevent a deterioration of the human rights and environmental situation in Brazil.

We therefore call on you to:

  1. Immediately halt negotiations for an EU-Mercosur free trade agreement.
  2. Guarantee that no Brazilian products sold in the EU, nor the financial markets underpinning them, are leading to increases in deforestation, land grabbing of native lands or human rights violations.
  3. Demand confirmation, with material evidence, that the Brazilian government will fulfill its commitments as part of the Paris Agreement on Climate Change.
  4. Increase support for Brazilian civil society, including strengthening the implementation of the EU Action Plan on Human Rights and Democracy and proactive consultations with Brazilian civil society organisations that address human rights and the democratic functioning of Brazilian civil society.
  5. Monitor and respond to human rights violations—including investigating cases since Bolsonaro’s election—and strengthen mechanisms to protect human rights defenders. For those most at risk, including Indigenous peoples and environmental defenders, the EU should provide direct and urgent support where required, including through political representations.

Sincerely,

ALBA Movimientos International
FIAN International International
foodwatch international International
GRAIN International
Greenpeace International
ISP Interamericas International
OMCT – World Organisation Against Torture International
Plataforma América Latina mejor sin TLC International
Alianza Biodiversidad International
PSI Public Service International Américas International
CIDSE – International family of Catholic social justice organisations Europe
Climate Alliance Europe
Corporate Europe Observatory Europe
ACT Alliance EU Europe
EU-LAT Network Europe
European Coordination Via Campesina Europe
European Environmental Bureau Europe
Fern Europe
Food & Water Europe Europe
Friends of the Earth Europe Europe
Institute for Agriculture and Trade Policy (IATP) Europe Europe
S2B network Europe
Slow Food Europe Europe
Acción por la Biodiversidad Argentina
Amigos de la Tierra Argentina Argentina
AMUMRA – Asociación Civil de Derechos Humanos Mujeres Unidas Migrantes y Refugiadas en Argentina Argentina
Asamblea Argentina mejor sin TLC Argentina
ATTAC Argentina Argentina
COMUNA (Colectiva en Movimiento por una Universidad Nuestramericana) en el FPDS-CN Argentina
Diálogo 2000 – Jubileo Sur Argentina Argentina
Frente Patria Grande Argentina
Frente Popular Dario Santillan Argentina
Fundación Grupo Efecto Positivo Argentina
INPADE / FOCO Argentina
Missionaries of Francisco Movement Argentina
Resumen Latinoamericano Argentina
Vamos- Frente Patria Grande Argentina
Anders Handeln Austria
Attac Austria Austria
Austrian Federal Chamber of Labour/AK Europa Austria
Climate Alliance Austria Austria
Coordination office of the Austrian episcopal conference for international development and mission (KOO) Austria
DKA Austria Austria
globalista Austria
Grüne Bildungswerkstatt NÖ Austria
Grupo Encuentro Austria Argentina – GEAA Austria
HORIZONT3000 Austria
Informationsgruppe Lateinamerika (IGLA) Austria
International Fellowship of Reconciliation Austria Austria
Jahoda -Bauer Institut Austria
NeSoVe / Network Social Responsibility Austria
ÖBV-Via Campesina Austria Austria
Parents For Future Vienna Austria
proge Union Austria
Selbstbesteuerungsgruppe Bischof Kräutler Austria
transform!at Austria
vöwg Austria
ELA Basque Country
Mugarik Gabe Basque Country
TRADENER Basque Country
Commission Justice et Paix Belgium
11.11.11 Belgium
Broederlijk Delen Belgium
CNCD-11.11.11 Belgium
Commission Justice et Paix Belgium
Entraide et Fraternité Belgium
FIAN Belgium Belgium
FIAN Belgium Belgium
Indignez-Vous Belgium
SOLIDAIR MET GUATEMALA Belgium
Fundación Solón Bolivia
Centar za zivotnu sredinu/ Friends of the Earth Bosnia and Herzegovina Bosnia and Herzegovina
Justiça nos Trilhos Brazil
Movimento dos Atingidos por Barragens – MAB Brazil
AMAST RJ Brazil
AMAU (Articulação Metropolitana de Agricultura Urbana e Periurbana) Brazil
Associação Alternativa Terrazul Brazil
Asssociação para Recuperação e Conservação do Ambiente – ARCA Brazil
Campanha Antipetroleira “Nem um poço a mais!” Brazil
Caritas Arquidiocesana de Brasília Brazil
Central Única dos Trabalhadores – CUT Brazil
Confederação Nacional dos Trabalhadores em Seguridade Social da CUT Brazil
CONFEDERAÇÃO NACIONAL DOS TRABALHADORES NA SAÚDE Brazil
Convívio Slow Food Parahyba Brazil
FASE – Solidariedade e Educação Brazil
Fasubra sindical Brazil
Federação das Organizações Indígenas do Rio Negro – FOIRN Brazil
Federação Nacional dos Enfermeiros Brazil
Fórum da Amazônia Oriental – FAOR Brazil
Fórum Mudanças Climáticas E Justiça Social Brazil
Friends of the Earth Brazil Brazil
Grupo semente Brazil
INESC – Instituto de Estúdios Socioeconômicos Brazil
İnstituto EQUİT – Gênero, Economia e Cidadania Global Brazil
Instituto Floresta de Pesquisa e Desenvolvimento Sustentável Brazil
Fórum Mudanças Climáticas E Justiça Social Brazil
Jubileu Sul Brasil Brazil
Justiça Global Brazil
Movimento dos Trabalhadores Sem Terra – MST Brazil
Movimento Urbano de Agroecologia – MUDA Brazil
OLMA – Observatório Nacional de Justiça Socioambiental Luciano Mendes de Almeida Brazil
Operação Amazônia Nativa Brazil
REBRİP- Rede Brasileira pela İntegração dos Povos Brazil
Rede Jubileu Sul Brazil
Slow Food Brasil Brazil
Tribunal Populr Brazil
Za Zemiata – Friends of the Earth Bulgaria Bulgaria
Comité pour les droits humains en Amérique latine – CDHAL Canada
Lafede.cat – Organitzacions per a la Justícia Global Catalunya
Plataforma Chile mejor sin TLC Chile
Coordinación social y política Marcha Patriótica Colombia
Marcha Patriotica Colombia
Proceso de Comunidades Negras Colombia
Zelena akcija / Friends of the Earth Croatia Croatia
Friends of the Earth Cyprus Cyprus
Ekumenicka akademie Czech Republic
Global Aktion Denmark
NOAH – Friends of the Earth Denmark
Verdens Skove Denmark
Oficina de Derechos de la Nauraleza Ecuador
Colectiva Feminista para el Desarrollo Local El Salvador
Fundación de e Estudios para la Aplicación del Derecho -FESPAD El Salvador
Fundación de Estudios para la Aplicación del Derecho -FESPAD- El Salvador
Friends of the Earth England, Wales and Northern Ireland England, Wales and Northern Ireland
Estonian Forest Aid (Eesti Metsa Abiks) Estonia
Estonian Society for Nature Conservation Estonia
Friends of the Earth Finland Finland
Friends of the Landless Finland
TTIP Network Finland Finland
ActionAid France France
Aitec France
alofa tuvalu France
AMAR Brasil France
Attac France France
Bloom France
cedetim/ipam France
collectif anti ogm 66 France
Collectif Causse Méjean – Gaz de Schiste NON ! France
Collectif Stop TAFTA / CETA France
Comité Pauvreté et Politique France
Commitee in solidarity with Indigenous Peoples of the Americas (CSIA-Nitassinan) France
Confederation paysanne France
Confédération Paysanne Tarn France
Emmaüs International France
FIDH (International Federation for Human Rights) France
France Amerique Latine France
France Nature Environnement France
LDH pays Rochefortais France
Le Lien 26 France
Les Amis de la Terre (Friends of the Earth France) France
Les Amis du Monde Diplomatique France
Les Amis du Mouvement des Sans Terre France
MNLE France
Parents For Future France France
ReAct France
Réseau européen pour la Démocratie au Brésil (RED.br) France
réseau Roosevelt France
Sherpa France
Radio Latina France
tu France
Bizi! France / Basque country
AG Recife e.V. Germany
Agrar Koordination Germany
Agrecol e.V. Germany
Andy Gheorghiu Consulting Germany
ARA e.V. Germany
Arbeitsgemeinschaft bäuerliche Landwirtschaft (AbL) Germany
Attac Germany Germany
Bischöfliches Hilfswerk MISEREOR Germany
Brasiliengruppe Tübingen Germany
Brasilieninitiative Freiburg e.V. Germany
Brasiliennetzwerk Niedersachsen Germany
Bund für Umwelt und Naturschutz Deutschland (BUND) / Friends of the Earth Germany Germany
BUND Laichingen Germany
Campact Germany
Coordination gegen BAYER-Gefahren Germany
DEAB e.V. Germany
Die AnStifter Germany
Die AnStifter Stuttgart Germany
Dona Flor e.V. Germany
Eine-Welt-Verein Pachamama Stuttgart Germany
Elternseminar Stuttgart Germany
Erich Fromm Institute Tuebingen Germany
FDCL – Center for Research and Documentation Chile-Latin America Germany
FIAN Deutschland Germany
Forum Ökologie & Papier Germany
GegenStrömung – CounterCurrent Germany
Gentechnikfrei21.de Germany
German NGO Forum on Environment and Development Germany
Health and Environment Justice Support International Germany
Informationsbüro Nicaragua e.V. Germany
Initiative kikuna e.V. – Zukunft Nachhaltig Gestalten Germany
just human e.V. Germany
Kaite-ZIM e. V. Germany
Kölner Bündnis für gerechten Welthandel Germany
Kolumbienkampagne Berlin Germany
Kooperation Brasilien e.V. Germany
Lernen im Aufbruch Germany
mediation and project management agrobiodiversity Germany
mediation and project management agrobiodiversity Germany
Naturfreunde Württemberg e.V. Germany
Naturschutzbund Deutschland Germany
Netzwerk Gerechter Welthandel Germany
Parents For Future Bensheim Germany
Parents for Future Freiburg Germany
Parents for Future Stuttgart Germany
People for Future Frankfurt Germany
POEMA – Armut und Umwelt in Amazonien Germany
PowerShift e.V. Germany
Pro REGENWALD Germany
ROBIN WOOD Germany
Save Our Seeds Germany
Society for Threatened Peoples Germany
Stiftung Solidarische Welt – Berta Kühnle Germany
Verein für eine gerechte Welt e.V. Germany
WEED – World Economy, Ecology & Development Germany
Welthaus Fürth Germany
Weltladen Rottenburg Germany
Weltladen-Dachverband e.V. Germany
Women Engage for a Common Future Germany
Wuppertaler Aktionsbündnis gegen TTIP und andere Freihandelsfallen Germany
Energeno Germany
Parents for Future Dortmund Germany
Consumer association for quality of life- ekpizo Greece
Asociación Comunitaria para el Desarrollo ASERJUS Guatemala
Comité de Unidad Campesina Guatemala
consejo de investigaciones en desarrollo Guatemala
Servicios Jurídicos y Sociales, S.C. Guatemala
Observatorio Sociolaboral y del Diálogo Social Ecuador Ecuador
Plateforme Haïtienne de Plaidoyer pour un Développement Alternatif Haití
DIAKONIA Honduras
Clean Air Action Group Hungary
Magyar Természetvédők Szövetsége (Friends of the Earth Hungary) Hungary
My Right To Breathe India
An Claíomh Glas Ireland
forest friends ireland Ireland
Guarani-Kaiowa Solidarity Ireland Ireland
Icsa Ireland
Irish Cattle & Sheep Farmers’ Association Ireland
Latin America Solidarity Centre Ireland
Leave No Trace Ireland Ireland
Peoples Movement – Gluaiseacht an Phobail Ireland
Radio Latina Ireland
ZWAI Ireland
Stop Ceta Alliance Ireland
Fair watch Italy
Parents For Future – Turin Italy
Stop TTIP Italia Italy
ASTM (Action Solidarité Tiers Monde) Luxembourg
Bio-Lëtzebuerg asbl Luxembourg
Mouvement Ecologique Luxembourg
natur&ëmwelt a.s.b.l. Luxembourg
Nature Trust – FEE Malta Malta
Unam Mexico
Red Mexicana de Acción frente al libre Comercio Mexico
Heñói Paraguay
Federacion por la Autodeterminacion de los Pueblos Indigenas – FAPI Paraguay
Derecho Ambiente y Recursos Naturales DAR Peru
Asociación Pro Derechos Humanos (APRODEH) Peru
CooperAcción Peru
La Junta Peru
Movimiento Nacional de Mujeres Todas Somos Micaela Peru
Red Peruana por una Globalización con Equidad – RedGE Peru
Red Peruana por una Globalización con Equidad RedGE Peru
Federación de Trabajadores del Agua Potable del Perú – FENTAP- Peru
Institute of Global Responsibility (IGO) Poland
ROZRUCH Poland
Associação de Combate à Precariedade – Precários Inflexíveis Portugal
Circo de Sonho Portugal
Climáximo Portugal
Corporations- Zero Tolerance Portugal
GEOTA Portugal
Glocal Faro Portugal
Glocal Faro Portugal
Mafra sem Glifosato Portugal
MAPA – Movimento de Acção Política Portugal
Palombar – Associação de Conservação da Natureza e do Património Rural Portugal
Parents For Future Portugal Portugal
plataforma algarve livre de petroleo Portugal
plataforma algarve livre de petroleo Portugal
Porto Sem OGM Portugal
Quercus, Associação Nacional de Conservação da Natureza Portugal
SOS Racismo Portugal Portugal
Teachers for Future Portugal
TROCA- Plataforma por um Comércio Internacional Justo Portugal
ZERO – Association for the Sustainability of the Earth System Portugal
Friends of the Siberian Forests Russia
Slow food Salvador Salvador
ALTERNATIVA REPUBLICANA Spain
Amigas de la Tierra Spain
Amigos de la Tierra Spain
ASiA- Associació Salut i Agroecologia Spain
Attac Spain Spain
Campanya Catalunya No als TCI Spain
COAG Spain
Col.lectiu Agudells Spain
CONGD-IB Spain
DES DE BAIX (Asociación para el debate y la Acción Ciudadana) Spain
Ecologistas en Acción Spain
Ecologistes en Acció Catalunya Spain
Economistas sin Fronteras Spain
Enginyeria Sense Fronteres Spain
Entrepueblos/Entrepobles/Entrepobos/Herriarte Spain
Iniciativa Cambio Personal Justicia Global Spain
INTUMA SL Spain
ISCOD – Instituto Sindical de Cooperación al desarrollo de UGT Spain
Marxa Mundial de Dones-Catalunya Spain
Observatorio de Multinacionales en América Latina – Paz con Dignidad Spain
Podemos Centro Spain
SETEM Catalunya Spain
SOLdePaz.Pachakuti Spain
SUDS Spain
UGT Spain
FIAN Sweden Sweden
FIAN Sweden Sweden
Jordens Vanner Sweden
Latinamerikagrupperna // Solidaridad Suecia-América Latina (SAL) Sweden
Parents For Future Sweden Sweden
Bruno Manser Fund Switzerland
Centre for Developmet and Environment, University of Bern Switzerland
Pro Natura / Friends of the Earth Switzerland Switzerland
Solifonds Switzerland
Arisa The Netherlands
Both ENDS The Netherlands
Commons Network The Netherlands
La Chispa, digitaal platform over Latijns Amerika The Netherlands
Milieudefensie – Friends of the Earth Netherlands The Netherlands
Platform Aarde Boer Consument The Netherlands
Platform Duurzame en Solidaire Economie The Netherlands
SOMO The Netherlands
Transnational Institute The Netherlands
Vrijschrift The Netherlands
Women’s International League for Peace and Freedom dutch section The Netherlands
Banana Link United Kingdom
CORE Coalition United Kingdom
EcoNexus United Kingdom
Farms not Factories United Kingdom
Global Justice Now United Kingdom
Globalizations journal United Kingdom
Health and Trade Network United Kingdom
Health and Trade Network United Kingdom
London Mining Network United Kingdom
Parents For Future UK United Kingdom
Traidcraft Exchange United Kingdom
War on Want United Kingdom
Rethinking Value Chains United Kingdom / France
Forest Peoples Programme United Kingdom and the Netherlands
REDES-Amigos del Tierra (FoE) Uruguay Uruguay
Mighty Earth USA

Photo credit : CIFOR – Mato Grosso, Brazil / CC BY-NC-ND 2.0


Soy and Cattle: Report 4

Rapid Response Monitoring System

Soy and Cattle, Report 4 | August 2019 

Based on June 2019 alerts

Prepared with

VIew as PDF

This report presents 12 cases of deforestation alerts based on data from DETER (System for Monitoring Deforestation on Real Time) and PRODES (Program for Deforestation Calculation) observed between 27 May and 27 June 2019 in the Amazon and Cerrado biomes in Brazil. Deforestation alerts considered in this report were visually confirmed. Six alerts are in the Amazon biome (one of which is ongoing deforestation at a farm already featured in an earlier report), and six are in the Cerrado biome (of which four are ongoing deforestation at farms already featured in earlier reports). Three separate alerts that fall in São José farms are considered as one case, as they are in an area under a land tenure conflict between JJF Holding de Investimentos e Participações (owned by José Valter Dias) and Coaceral.















Cargill Nomeada “Pior Empresa no Mundo”

Cargill Nomeada “Pior Empresa no Mundo”

Novos relatórios documentam a “inépcia e incoerência em grande escala” da gigante do agronegócio sediada nos Estados Unidos

11 de julho de 2019

MINNEAPOLIS, Minnesota – A organização de campanhas ambientais Mighty Earth anunciou hoje que havia nomeado a Cargill, com sede em Minnesota, como a “pior empresa do mundo” devido a práticas comerciais inescrupulosas, destruição ambiental e insistência repetitiva em obstruir o progresso global em termos de sustentabilidade. O novo relatório da Mighty Earth, [“Cargill: The Worst Company in the World”] “Cargill: A pior empresa do mundo”, documenta décadas de atos falhos da empresa e destaca a necessidade de uma ação urgente.

“Nos meus 40 anos de carreira no Congresso, eu lidei com várias empresas que se envolveram em práticas abusivas,” Henry Waxman, ex-deputado e presidente da Mighty Earth, escreve no relatório. “Eu vi em primeira mão o impacto prejudicial de empresas que não trazem sua ética consigo ao trabalho. Mas a Cargill se destaca.”

“Como uma das maiores empresas do mundo, a Cargill tem a responsabilidade de lidar com seu impacto colossal,” o CEO da Mighty Earth, Glenn Hurowitz, disse. “A Mighty Earth realiza campanhas em todo o mundo para defender práticas empresariais sustentáveis, e a Cargill continuou vindo à tona quando nossos investigadores buscavam identificar os atores ruins. Quer estivéssemos trabalhando com óleo de dendê no Sudeste Asiático, com uma plantação de cacau na África Ocidental, ou com o cultivo de soja na América do Sul, a Cargill estava sempre presente, pronta para frustrar o progresso e impedir esforços conjuntos para conservação. Dada sua onipresença e obstinação, decidimos que era hora de dar uma olhada mais de perto no seu passado.”

 

Durante meses a Mighty Earth se envolveu em discussões com a Cargill, inclusive no nível de CEO, para tratar das conclusões do relatório e buscar soluções de longo prazo. A Mighty Earth tem servido como um mediador chave para outros setores – incluindo borracha, chocolate e óleo de dendê – assim que essas empresas buscaram melhorar seus padrões e impactos ambientais. No entanto, a Cargill recusou-se, [time and time again] repetidamente, a abordar substantivamente os problemas identificados pela Mighty Earth. Em vez disso, a Cargill continua priorizando desflorestadores em suas cadeias de suprimento em vez de priorizar o clima ou as demandas de sustentabilidade de seus clientes.

“Em comunicados de imprensa e declarações públicas, a gigante do agronegócio Cargill expressa frustração com o desmatamento, como se fosse algo externo sobre o qual ela não têm controle, como o mau tempo”, disse Hurowitz. “Mas o desmatamento não é algo que está acontecendo com a Cargill, é algo que a Cargill está fazendo.”

O novo relatório da Mighty Earth identifica a Ahold Delhaize – um gigante internacional de supermercados que é dona do Stop & Shop, Giant, Food Lion, Hannaford e muitas outras marcas – como um dos cliente-chaves da Cargill que poderia tomar medidas imediatas. A Ahold Delhaize, apesar de suas próprias promessas de sustentabilidade corporativa, recentemente iniciou uma nova instalação de embalagem de carne em Rhode Island através de um consórcio com a Cargill.

“É importante que a Ahold Delhaize e outros clientes da Cargill estabeleçam novos padrões de fornecimento que eliminem o desmatamento de suas cadeias de suprimentos. Eles têm o poder de forçar a mão da Cargill, mas a contínua falta de ação faz com que eles sejam cúmplices da má conduta da Cargill ”, disse Mat Jacobson, o Diretor Sênior de Florestas da Mighty Earth. “A Cargill só conseguiu se comportar mal por tanto tempo porque não é uma marca voltada para o consumidor. Mas se as pessoas soubessem que a comida que recebem no McDonald’s, Stop & Shop ou Target estava destruindo as florestas tropicais ou que havia sido produzida com escravidão infantil, elas ficariam chocadas ”.

O lançamento do relatório inovador da Mighty Earth dá início a uma longa e multimilionária campanha que enquadra a Cargill e seus clientes. A campanha vai pressionar a gigante do agronegócio a eliminar o desmatamento e os abusos dos direitos humanos de sua cadeia de fornecimento. Para lançar a campanha, ativistas e aliados locais da Mighty Earth, incluindo a Minnesota Clean Water Action, premiaram a Cargill com condecoração duvidosa através de um comício fora da sede da Cargill em Minnesota, no qual ela premiou a empresa com um cartaz de “polegares para baixo”.

Sobre o relatório

Principais descobertas:

  • A Cargill está posicionada para causar mais danos aos frágeis ecossistemas do Brasil, aproveitando a reversão do presidente Bolsonaro de passadas proteções ambientais vitais. Em 2014, a Cargill prometeu acabar com o desmatamento de todas as mercadorias de sua cadeia de fornecimento até 2020. Com apenas um ano, a Cargill continuou a incentivar o desmatamento, permaneceu um dos piores atores no cenário mundial e agora está preparada para abraçar o futuro de uma era Bolsonaro onde vale tudo nas florestas brasileiras.
  • Em novembro de 2017, a Cargill foi multada em US$ 10 milhões pela Commodity Futures Trading Commission por anos de relatórios deliberadamente incorretos sobre seus valores comerciais – com valores incorretos em até 90% – a fim de fraudar tanto o governo quanto seus próprios parceiros comerciais. Em outubro de 2018, David Dines, executivo da Cargill responsável por essas violações, foi promovido a diretor financeiro.
  • Os povos indígenas que dependem das florestas tiveram suas terras invadidas pelas plantações de soja ligadas à Cargill no Brasil. Eles foram forçados a sair de suas terras tradicionais e sofreram aumentos acentuados em índices de câncer, defeitos congênitos, abortos e outras doenças ligadas a pesticidas e herbicidas usados ​​para cultivar soja – frequentemente pulverizados por aviões diretamente acima da cabeça.
  • A Cargill é uma das dez maiores poluidoras da indústria alimentícia dos EUA no que diz respeito a mais de uma dúzia de poluentes, incluindo formaldeído, chumbo, amianto, cianeto de hidrogênio e mercúrio.

Os recursos de foto e vídeo relacionados ao relatório e as operações da Cargill em diferentes mercadorias estão disponíveis para mídia.

Contato: Alex Armstrong, [email protected]


Cargill zum „schlimmsten Unternehmen der Welt“ ernannt

Cargill zum „schlimmsten Unternehmen der Welt“ ernannt

Ein neuer Bericht dokumentiert die „umfassende Untauglichkeit und Inkohärenz“ des US-Agrarriesen.

  1. Juli 2019

MINNEAPOLIS, Minnesota. – Die Umweltorganisation Mighty Earth verkündete heute, dass sie das in Minnesota ansässige Unternehmen Cargill wegen seiner skrupellosen Geschäftspraktiken, seines umweltzerstörerischen Verhaltens und seiner hartnäckigen Behinderung der globalen Fortschritte in Bezug auf Nachhaltigkeit zum „schlimmsten Unternehmen der Welt“ ernannt hat. Der neue Bericht von Mighty Earth, [“Cargill: The Worst Company in the World”] „Cargill: Das schlimmste Unternehmen der Welt“, dokumentiert die Untaten des Unternehmens über Jahrzehnte hinweg und betont den dringenden Handlungsbedarf.

„In meiner 40-jährigen Karriere im US-Kongress habe ich es mit einer Reihe von Unternehmen aufgenommen, die Missbrauch praktizierten,“ schreibt der ehemalige Abgeordnete und Vorsitzende von Mighty Earth, Henry Waxman, in dem Bericht.

„Ich habe mit eigenen Augen gesehen, welche schädlichen Auswirkungen Unternehmen haben, die die Ethik außen vor lassen. Doch Cargill sticht unter all diesen Unternehmen heraus.”

„Als eines der weltweit größten Unternehmen muss Cargill die Verantwortung für die überdimensionalen Auswirkungen, die es verursacht, übernehmen,“ erklärte der Mighty Earth-CEO, Glenn Hurowitz. „Mighty Earth setzt sich in Kampagnen rund um den Globus für nachhaltige Geschäftspraktiken ein. Dabei kam der Name Cargill immer wieder zur Sprache, wenn unsere Ermittlungen Untäter identifizierten – ob bei unserer Arbeit mit Palmöl in Südostasien, dem Kakaoanbau im westlichen Afrika oder dem Sojaanbau in Südamerika, Cargill war überall mit dabei und stets bereit, Fortschritte zu vereiteln und gemeinsame Naturschutzbestrebungen zu erschweren. Angesichts der Allgegenwärtigkeit und Starrsinnigkeit des Unternehmens entschieden wir, dessen zwiespältige Vergangenheit unter die Lupe zu nehmen.“

Monatelang führte Mighty Earth Gespräche mit Cargill, selbst auf CEO-Ebene, um die Ergebnisse des Berichts aufzugreifen und nach langfristigen Lösungen zu suchen. Mighty Earth hat in vielen anderen Bereichen – einschließlich Kautschuk, Schokolade und Palmöl – als Wegbereiter agiert, als Unternehmen dieser Branchen an der Verbesserung ihrer Umweltstandards und deren Auswirkungen arbeiteten. Cargill hat sich jedoch wieder und wieder geweigert, die von Mighty Earth identifizierten Probleme in bedeutender Weise anzugehen. Stattdessen stellt Cargill weiterhin die Entwaldungsunternehmen in seiner Lieferkette über das Klima oder die Nachhaltigkeitsforderungen seiner Kunden.

„In Pressemitteilungen und öffentlichen Stellungnahmen erklärt der Agrarriese Cargill seine Frustration über die Entwaldung, als handle es sich dabei um eine Externalität, über die das Unternehmen keine Kontrolle hat, etwa wie schlechtes Wetter,“ so Hurowitz. „Aber die Entwaldung wird Cargill nicht angetan, sondern sie wird von Cargill verübt.“

Der neue Bericht von Mighty Earth identifiziert Ahold Delhaize – einen internationalen Supermarktriesen und Eigentümer von Stop & Shop, Giant, Food Lion, Hannaford und vielen anderen Marken – als einen der wichtigsten Kunden von Cargill, der unmittelbare Maßnahmen ergreifen könnte. Trotz der eigenen Versprechen zur Unternehmensnachhaltigkeit, begann Ahold Delhaize vor kurzem in einem Joint Venture mit Cargill den Bau eines neuen Fleischverpackungswerks in Rhode Island.

„Es ist wichtig, dass Ahold Delhaize und andere Cargill-Kunden neue Beschaffungsstandards setzen, die die Entwaldung aus ihren Lieferketten eliminieren. Sie haben die Macht, Cargill in Zugzwang zu bringen – ihre andauernde Tatenlosigkeit macht sie jedoch zu Mitschuldigen an Cargills Vergehen,“ erklärte der Senior Director for Forests bei Mighty Earth, Mat Jacobson. „Cargill ist mit seinem schädlichen Verhalten bislang nur deshalb davongekommen, weil es als Marke nicht direkt mit Verbrauchern in Kontakt kommt. Doch wenn die Menschen wüssten, dass die Lebensmittel, die sie bei McDonald’s oder in Stop & Shop und Target kaufen, die Regenwälder zerstören oder mithilfe von Kindersklaverei hergestellt wurden, wären sie schockiert.“

Die Veröffentlichung des bahnbrechenden Berichts von Mighty Earth ist der Start einer mehrere Millionen Dollar schweren und mehrere Jahre umfassenden Kampagne gegen Cargill und dessen Kunden, die den Agrarriesen auffordert, die Entwaldung und Menschenrechtsverletzungen aus seiner Lieferkette zu eliminieren. Zum Kampagnenstart zeichneten lokale Aktivisten von Mighty Earth und deren Verbündete, einschließlich der Clean Water Action von Minnesota, Cargill für seine zweifelhafte Ehre im Rahmen einer Kundgebung vor dem Cargill-Hauptquartier in Minnesota mit einer „Daumen runter“-Plakette aus.

 

Über den Bericht

Die wichtigsten Ergebnisse:

  • Cargill ist bereit, an empfindlichen Ökosystemen in Brasilien noch mehr verheerenden Schaden anzurichten und macht sich dabei die Zurücknahme von grundlegenden Umweltschutzregelungen durch Präsident Bolsonaro zunutze. 2014 versprach Cargill, bis 2020 die Entwaldung für alle Rohstoffe in seiner Lieferkette zu beenden. Ein Jahr vor diesem Termin schafft Cargill weiterhin Anreize für die Entwaldung und bleibt damit einer der schlimmsten Akteure auf der Weltbühne. Nun steht das Unternehmen kurz davor, den Beginn einer von Bolsonaro eingeläuteten Ära der Anarchie in den Wäldern Brasiliens auszunutzen.
  • Im November 2017 wurde Cargill von der Commodity Futures Trading Commission mit einer Geldstrafe in Höhe von 10 Millionen US-Dollar belegt, nachdem es jahrelang falsche Angaben zu den eigenen Handelswerten gemacht hatte – und zwar um bis zu 90 Prozent –, mit der Absicht sowohl die Regierung als auch seine Handelspartner zu betrügen. Im Oktober 2018 wurde der für diese Vergehen verantwortliche Direktor bei Cargill, David Dines, zum Chief Financial Officer befördert.
  • Mit Cargill verbundene Sojaplantagen in Brasilien nehmen Land ein, das indigenen Völkern gehört, die von den Wäldern abhängig sind. Sie werden von ihrem traditionellen Land vertrieben und erfahren einen starken Anstieg an Krebserkrankungen, Geburtsfehlern, Fehlgeburten und andern Krankheiten, die mit im Sojaanbau eingesetzten, häufig von Flugzeugen direkt über ihren Köpfen versprühten, Pestiziden und Herbiziden in Verbindung gebracht werden.
  • In der US-Lebensmittelindustrie ist Cargill mit mehr als einem Dutzend Umweltschadstoffe, einschließlich Formaldehyd, Blei, Asbest, Blausäure und Quecksilber, in den Top Ten der Umweltverschmutzer.

Fotos und Videoinhalte zu dem Bericht und zu Cargills Operationen in Verbindung mit verschiedenen Rohstoffen stehen für die Presse zur Verfügung.

Kontakt: Alex Armstrong, [email protected]


Cargill genaamd tot "Slechtste Bedrijf ter Wereld"

Cargill genaamd tot "Slechtste Bedrijf ter Wereld"

Nieuw rapport documenteert de “onbekwaamheid en incoherentie op grote schaal” van de in de VS gevestigde reus uit de agrosector.

11 juli 2019

MINNEAPOLIS, Minn. – Milieucampagne-organisatie Mighty Earth kondigde vandaag aan dat het Cargill uit Minnesota heeft uitgeroepen tot het “Slechtste Bedrijf ter Wereld” vanwege zijn gewetenloze handelspraktijken, vernietiging van het milieu en herhaalde inzet voor het belemmeren van wereldwijde vooruitgang op het gebied van duurzaamheid. Het nieuwe rapport van Mighty Earth, “Cargill: Het Slechtste Bedrijf ter Wereld“, documenteert tientallen jaren van slechte daden door het bedrijf en onderstreept de noodzaak van dringende actie.

“In mijn 40-jarige carrière in het Congres heb ik het opgenomen tegen tal van bedrijven die zich schuldig hadden gemaakt aan diverse misbruiken,” schrijft voormalig Congreslid en Mighty Earth-voorzitter Henry Waxman in het rapport. “Ik heb uit de eerste hand de schadelijke gevolgen gezien van bedrijven die tijdens hun werkzaamheden geen ruimte hebben voor ethiek. Maar Cargill is daarbij wel zeer opvallend.”

“Als een van de grootste bedrijven ter wereld heeft Cargill een verantwoordelijkheid om zijn buitenmaatse invloed onder ogen te zien,” aldus Glenn Hurowitz, de CEO van Mighty Earth. “Mighty Earth voert campagnes over de hele wereld om te pleiten voor duurzame bedrijfspraktijken, en Cargill bleef overal opduiken toen onze onderzoeken ‘slechte spelers’ aan het licht brachten. Of we nu werkten aan palmolie in Zuidoost-Azië, aan de cacaoteelt in West-Afrika of aan de sojateelt in Zuid-Amerika, Cargill stond altijd klaar om de vooruitgang te dwarsbomen en gezamenlijke inspanningen voor het natuurbehoud te belemmeren. Gezien hun alomtegenwoordigheid en halsstarrigheid, besloten we dat het tijd was om hun dubieuze verleden eens onder de loep te nemen.”

Maandenlang heeft Mighty Earth gesprekken gevoerd met Cargill, ook op het CEO-niveau, om de bevindingen van het rapport te bespreken en naar oplossingen voor de lange termijn te zoeken. Mighty Earth heeft gediend als een belangrijke organisator voor andere sectoren, waaronder rubber, chocolade en palmolie, toen die bedrijven probeerden hun milieunormen en gevolgen voor het milieu te verbeteren. Cargill heeft echter geweigerd, telkens en telkens opnieuw, om de problemen die Mighty Earth identificeerde inhoudelijk aan te pakken. In plaats daarvan blijft Cargill voorrang geven aan de ontbossers in zijn toeleveringsketens, boven het klimaat of de roep om duurzaamheid van hun klanten.

“In persberichten en openbare uitspraken presenteert de agrogigant Cargill zichzelf als gefrustreerd door ontbossing, alsof het een of andere externe factor is waar ze geen controle over hebben, zoals slecht weer,” aldus Hurowitz. “Maar ontbossing is niet iets wat Cargill overkomt, het is iets wat Cargill zelf doet.”

In het nieuwe rapport van Mighty Earth wordt Ahold Delhaize, een internationale supermarktgigant die eigenaar is van Stop & Shop, Giant, Food Lion, Hannaford en vele andere merken, geïdentificeerd als een belangrijke klant van Cargill die onmiddellijk actie zou kunnen ondernemen. Ahold Delhaize heeft ondanks zijn eigen beloften op het vlak van duurzaamheid onlangs een nieuwe vleesverpakkingsfabriek geopend in Rhode Island, als een joint venture met Cargill.

“Het is belangrijk voor Ahold Delhaize en andere klanten van Cargill om nieuwe inkoopnormen te bepalen die de ontbossing elimineren uit hun toeleveringsketens. Ze hebben de macht om de hand van Cargill te dwingen, maar hun voortdurende inactiviteit maakt hen medeplichtig aan het misdrijf van Cargill,” aldus Mat Jacobson, de Mighty Earth senior directeur voor bossen. “Cargill heeft alleen maar zo lang kunnen wegkomen met zijn slechte gedrag, omdat het geen merk is dat op de consument gericht is. Maar als mensen wisten dat het voedsel dat ze bij McDonald’s, Stop & Shop of Target krijgen, de regenwouden vernietigt of met kinderslavernij is geproduceerd, zouden ze geschokt zijn.”

De publicatie van het baanbrekende rapport van Mighty Earth vormt het startschot voor een meerjarige campagne van meerdere miljoenen dollars, die is gericht op Cargill en zijn klanten en die er bij de reus uit de agrosector op zal aandringen om ontbossing en schendingen van de mensenrechten te elimineren uit zijn toeleveringsketen. Om de campagne te lanceren, betoonden lokale activisten en bondgenoten van Mighty Earth, waaronder Minnesota Clean Water Action, Cargill eer voor zijn twijfelachtige onderscheiding met een rally buiten het hoofdkantoor van Cargill in Minnesota, waarbij het bedrijf een “duim omlaag”-plakkaat ontving.

Over het rapport

Belangrijkste bevindingen:

  • Cargill staat op het punt om nog meer schade toe te brengen aan kwetsbare ecosystemen in Brazilië, door te profiteren van het feit dat president Bolsonaro cruciale voorschriften op het gebied van milieubescherming heeft teruggedraaid. In 2014 heeft Cargill beloofd om tegen 2020 de ontbossing te beëindigen voor alle goederen in zijn toeleveringsketen. Met nog maar een jaar te gaan is Cargill de ontbossing blijven stimuleren, is het een van de slechtste spelers op het wereldtoneel gebleven en staat nu op het punt om het begin van een Bolsonaro-tijdperk zonder enige voorschriften in de bossen van Brazilië te omarmen.
  • In november 2017 werd Cargill door de Commodity Futures Trading Commission een boete van 10 miljoen dollar opgelegd voor het jarenlange opzettelijk onjuist rapporteren van zijn handelswaarden (tot wel 90 procent) om daarmee zowel de overheid als zijn handelspartners te bedriegen. In oktober 2018 ontving David Dines, de Cargill-directeur die verantwoordelijk was voor deze schendingen, een promotie tot Chief Financial Officer.
  • Het land van inheemse volken die afhankelijk zijn van bossen is aangetast door met Cargill verbonden sojaplantages in Brazilië. Ze zijn van hun traditionele land verdreven en ervaren een sterke toename van kanker, geboorteafwijkingen, miskramen en andere ziekten die verband houden met pesticiden en herbiciden die worden gebruikt om soja te verbouwen, welke vaak worden gesproeid door vliegtuigen die rechtstreeks boven hun hoofd vliegen.
  • Cargill is een van de top tien grootste vervuilers in de Amerikaanse voedingsmiddelenindustrie voor meer dan een dozijn verontreinigende stoffen, waaronder formaldehyde, lood, asbest, waterstofcyanide en kwik.

Er zijn foto- en videomiddelen met betrekking tot het rapport en de activiteiten van Cargill voor verschillende grondstoffen beschikbaar voor de media.

Contact: Alex Armstrong, [email protected]


Cargill nommée « la pire entreprise au monde »

Cargill nommée « la pire entreprise au monde »

Un nouveau rapport documente « l’incompétence et l’incohérence à grande échelle » du géant américain de l’agroalimentaire..

Le 11 juillet 2019

MINNEAPOLIS, Minnesota – L’organisation de la campagne pour l’environnement Mighty Earth a annoncée aujourd’hui qu’elle avait désigné Cargill, basée au Minnesota, comme la « pire entreprise au monde » en raison de ses pratiques commerciales sans scrupules, de sa destruction de l’environnement et de son opposition continuelle contre les progrès mondiaux en matière de la protection de l’environnent et des ressources naturelles. Le nouveau rapport de Mighty Earth, Lien : Cargill: The Worst Company in the World documente des décennies d’inconduites de la part de la société et souligne la nécessité d’une action urgente.

« Au cours de mes 40 années de carrière au Congrès, j’ai confronté diverses entreprises qui se livraient à des pratiques abusives », écrit Henry Waxman, ancien membre du Congrès et président de Mighty Earth. « J’ai pu constater directement l’impact néfaste des entreprises qui n’apportaient pas leur code d’éthique et de conduite au travail. Mais Cargill se démarque. »

« En tant qu’une des plus grandes entreprises au monde, Cargill a la responsabilité de faire face à son impact démesuré, » a déclaré Glenn Hurowitz, P.D.G de Mighty Earth. « Mighty Earth mène des campagnes dans le monde entier pour plaider en faveur de pratiques commerciales respectueuses de l’environnent et le nom de Cargill n’a pas cessé de se manifester lorsque nos enquêtes ont identifié les mauvais acteurs. Que nous travaillions sur l’huile de palme en Asie du Sud-Est, la culture du cacao en Afrique de l’Ouest ou la culture du soja en Amérique du Sud, Cargill était toujours là, prête à contrecarrer les progrès et à entraver les efforts conjoints de conservation. Étant donné leur omniprésence et leur obstination, nous avons décidé qu’il était temps de regarder de près, leur passé douteux.

Depuis des mois, Mighty Earth a engagé des discussions avec Cargill, y compris au niveau du P.D.G, afin d’examiner les conclusions du rapport et de chercher des solutions à long terme. Mighty Earth a été l’organisateur principal dans d’autres secteurs – y compris le caoutchouc, le chocolat et l’huile de palme – dans la mesure où ses entreprises ont cherché à améliorer leurs normes et leurs impacts environnementaux. Cependant, Cargill a refusé, à plusieurs reprises, de résoudre concrètement les problèmes identifiés par Mighty Earth. Au lieu de cela, Cargill continue de donner priorité aux responsables de la déforestation de ses chaînes d’approvisionnement au lieu de donner priorité au climat ou aux exigences environnementales de leurs clients.

« Dans les communiqués de presse et les déclarations publiques, le géant de l’agroalimentaire Cargill se présente comme frustré par la déforestation, comme s’il s’agissait d’une cause externe sur laquelle il n’avait aucun contrôle, comme le mauvais temps », a déclaré Hurowitz. « Mais la déforestation n’est pas quelque chose qui arrive à Cargill, mais quelque chose que Cargill fait à l’environnement. »

Le nouveau rapport de Mighty Earth identifie Ahold Delhaize, un géant international des supermarchés et propriétaire de Stop – Shop, Giant, Food Lion, Hannaford et de nombreuses autres marques – comme un client clé de Cargill qui pourrait prendre des mesures immédiates. Ahold Delhaize, en dépit de ses propres engagements en matière de protection de l’environnement, a récemment ouvert le chemin à une nouvelle usine d’emballage de viande situé à Rhode Island en coentreprise avec Cargill.

« Il est important pour Ahold Delhaize et d’autres clients de Cargill d’établir de nouvelles normes d’approvisionnement qui éliminent la déforestation de leurs chaînes d’approvisionnement. Ils peuvent forcer la main de Cargill, mais l’inaction continue les rend complices des méfaits de Cargill », a déclaré Mat Jacobson, directeur principal du secteur des Forets à Mighty Earth. « Cargill ne s’en est tiré avec son mauvais comportement depuis longtemps que parce que ce n’est pas une marque qui négocie auprès du consommateur. Mais si les consommateurs savaient que leur nourriture achetée chez McDonald’s, Stop et Shop, ou Target détruisait les forêts tropicales ou avait été produite au prix de l’esclavage des enfants, ils seraient choqués.

La publication de ce rapport historique de Mighty Earth donne le coup d’envoi à une campagne pluriannuelle de plusieurs millions de dollars ciblant Cargill et ses clients qui exhorteront le géant de l’agroalimentaire à éliminer la déforestation et les atteintes aux droits humains de sa chaîne d’approvisionnement. Pour lancer la campagne, les activistes locaux de Mighty Earth et leurs alliés, y compris Clean Water Action du Minnesota, ont honoré Cargill de cette distinction douteuse lors d’un rassemblement devant le siège de Cargill dans le Minnesota au cours duquel elle a décerné à l’entreprise une plaque avec « pouces vers le bas ». 

À propos du rapport

Principales constatations :

  • Cargill est sur le point de faire encore des ravages sur les écosystèmes fragiles du Brésil, en profitant de la réduction des protections environnementales vitales par le président Bolsonaro. En 2014, Cargill s’est engagée à mettre fin à la déforestation dans sa chaîne d’approvisionnement pour tous ses produits d’ici 2020. Cependant, avec seulement un an restant, Cargill continue d’encourager la déforestation et reste l’un des pires acteurs sur la scène mondiale et est maintenant prêt à embrasser l’aube de l’ère-Bolsonaro avec la libre exploitation des forêts du Brésil.
  • En novembre 2017, Cargill a été condamnée à une amende de 10 millions de dollars par l’Organe de contrôle et de régulation des marchés financiers américains (Commodity Futures Trading Commission) pour les années de fausses déclarations délibérée en matière de ses valeurs commerciales—jusqu’à 90 pour cent—afin de frauder le gouvernement et ses partenaires commerciaux. En octobre 2018, David Dines, le directeur de Cargill et responsable de ces violations, a été promu au poste de directeur financier.
  • Au Brésil, les plantations de soja liées à Cargill ont envahi les terres des peuples autochtones tributaires des forêts. Ils ont été forcés de quitter leurs terres natives et ont connu une forte augmentation de cancers, de malformations congénitales, de fausses couches et d’autres maladies liées aux pesticides et aux herbicides souvent pulvérisés directement par avion et utilisés pour la culture du soja.
  • Cargill est l’un des dix principaux pollueurs de l’industrie alimentaire américaine pour plus d’une douzaine de polluants, y compris le formaldéhyde, le plomb, l’amiante, le cyanure d’hydrogène et le mercure.

Les ressources photographiques et vidéo relatives au rapport et aux activités de Cargill sur différents produits sont disponibles pour les médias.

Contact : Alex Armstrong, [email protected]


Cargill nombrada “La peor empresa del mundo”

Cargill nombrada “La peor empresa del mundo”

Un nuevo informe documenta la “ineptitud e incoherencia a gran escala del gigante de los agronegocios de EE. UU.”.

11 de julio de 2019

MINNEAPOLIS, Minn. – La organización de la campaña ambiental Mighty Earth anunció hoy que nombró a Cargill, con sede en Minnesota, como la “peor empresa del mundo” debido a sus prácticas comerciales inescrupulosas, la destrucción del medio ambiente y la insistencia reiterada en obstaculizar el progreso global en materia de sostenibilidad. El nuevo informe de Mighty Earth, [“Cargill: The Worst Company in the World”] (Cargill: La peor empresa del mundo), documenta décadas de malas prácticas cometidas por la compañía y destaca la necesidad de tomar medidas urgentes.

“En mi carrera de 40 años en el Congreso, asumí el mando de una serie de compañías que llevaban a cabo prácticas abusivas”, escribió en el informe el ex congresista y presidente de Mighty Earth, Henry Waxman. “He visto de primera mano el impacto dañino de las empresas que no llevan su ética al trabajo. Pero Cargill se destaca”.

“Como una de las empresas más grandes del mundo, Cargill tiene la responsabilidad de abordar su gran impacto”, dijo el CEO de Mighty Earth, Glenn Hurowitz. “Mighty Earth realiza campañas en todo el mundo para abogar por prácticas comerciales sostenibles, y Cargill nunca dejó de aparecer en nuestras investigaciones cuando identificamos a los malos actores. Ya sea que trabajáramos en el aceite de palma en el sudeste asiático, en el cultivo de cacao en África occidental o en el cultivo de soja en América del Sur, Cargill siempre estaba allí, listo para impedir el progreso e impedir los esfuerzos conjuntos de conservación. Dada su ubicuidad y obstinación, decidimos que era hora de analizar con más detenimiento su cuestionable pasado”.

Durante meses, Mighty Earth ha mantenido conversaciones con Cargill, incluso a nivel de CEO, para abordar los hallazgos del informe y buscar soluciones a largo plazo. Mighty Earth ha servido como un coordinador clave para otros sectores, como el caucho, el chocolate y el aceite de palma, ya que esas compañías buscaron mejorar sus estándares e impactos ambientales. Sin embargo, Cargill se ha negado una y otra vez a abordar de manera profunda los problemas que identificó Mighty Earth. En cambio, Cargill continúa dando prioridad a los deforestadores en sus cadenas de suministro sobre el clima o las demandas de sostenibilidad de sus clientes.

“En comunicados de prensa y declaraciones públicas, el gigante de los agronegocios Cargill se presenta como frustrado por la deforestación, como si fuera un factor externo sobre el que no tiene control, como el mal tiempo”, dijo Hurowitz. “Pero la deforestación no es algo que le esté sucediendo a Cargill, es algo que Cargill está haciendo”.

El nuevo informe de Mighty Earth identifica a Ahold Delhaize, un gigante internacional de supermercados que posee Stop & Shop, Giant, Food Lion, Hannaford y muchas otras marcas, como un cliente clave de Cargill que podría tomar medidas de inmediato. Ahold Delhaize, a pesar de sus propios compromisos de sostenibilidad corporativa, recientemente inició una nueva instalación de envasado de carne en Rhode Island como una empresa conjunta con Cargill.

“Es importante para Ahold Delhaize y otros clientes de Cargill establecer nuevos estándares de abastecimiento que eliminen la deforestación de sus cadenas de suministro. Tienen el poder de de obligar a Cargill, pero la inacción continua los hace cómplices de las infracciones de Cargill”, dijo el Director Senior de Bosques de Mighty Earth, Mat Jacobson. “Cargill ha logrado salirse con la suya con su mal comportamiento durante tanto tiempo porque no es una marca orientada al consumidor. Pero si la gente supiera que la comida que compran en McDonald’s, Stop & Shop o Target está destruyendo las selvas tropicales o que fue producida con la esclavitud infantil, se escandalizaría”.

La publicación del revolucionario informe de Mighty Earth da inicio a una campaña multimillonaria que llevará varios años dirigida a Cargill y sus clientes, y que instará al gigante de los agronegocios a eliminar la deforestación y los abusos de los derechos humanos de su cadena de suministro. Para lanzar la campaña, los activistas locales de Mighty Earth y sus aliados, entre ellos, Minnesota Clean Water Action, honraron a Cargill por su dudoso mérito con un acto frente a la sede de Cargill en Minnesota, en el que le otorgó a la empresa un cartel de “desaprobación”.

Sobre el informe

Descubrimientos importantes:

  • Cargill está a punto de causar más estragos en los ecosistemas frágiles de Brasil, aprovechando la reducción de las protecciones ambientales vitales del presidente Bolsonaro. En 2014, Cargill se comprometió a poner fin a la deforestación de todos los productos básicos en su cadena de suministro para 2020. A tan solo un año de esa fecha, Cargill ha continuado incentivando la deforestación, sigue siendo uno de los peores actores en el escenario mundial y ahora se prepara para aprovechar el comienzo de una etapa de libertad para todos en los bosques de Brasil, impuesta por Bolsonaro.
  • En noviembre de 2017, Cargill recibió una multa de $10 millones por parte de la Comisión de Comercio de Futuros de Productos Básicos (Commodity Futures Trading Commission) por años de informar erróneamente sus valores comerciales (hasta en un 90 por ciento) para estafar al gobierno y sus socios comerciales. En octubre de 2018, David Dines, el ejecutivo de Cargill responsable de estas infracciones, fue ascendido a Director Financiero.
  • En Brasil, los pueblos indígenas que dependen de los bosques han visto sus tierras invadidas por las plantaciones de soja vinculadas a Cargill. Han sido obligados a abandonar sus tierras tradicionales y han sufrido fuertes aumentos en los índices de cáncer, malformaciones congénitas, abortos espontáneos y otras enfermedades relacionadas con los pesticidas y herbicidas que se utilizan para cultivar soja y que a menudo son pulverizados por aviones directamente sobre sus cabezas.
  • Cargill es uno de los diez principales contaminadores de la industria de alimentos de EE. UU. ya que utiliza más de una decena de contaminantes, incluidos el formaldehído, el plomo, el asbesto, el cianuro de hidrógeno y el mercurio.

Las fotos y los videos relacionados con el informe y las operaciones de Cargill en diferentes productos están disponibles para los medios.

Contacto: Alex Armstrong, [email protected]


Mighty Earth responds to the Fires in the Amazon

As the Amazon continues to burn at a record rate, Mighty Earth CEO Glenn Hurowitz released the following statement:

“People around the world are battling despair and a sense of helplessness, wondering what can be done to address this ongoing disaster. The answer is to hold people accountable and immediately remove the market incentives that promote this reckless environmental destruction.

“The people who started many of these fires did so in support of Bolsonaro’s policies to develop the Amazon, but they also clear forests because they know that companies will still buy their ill-gotten goods. Major food companies like Stop & Shop and McDonald’s are willing to look the other way while the Amazon burns.

“No more. It’s time for companies like McDonald’s, Burger King, and Ahold Delhaize – which owns Stop & Shop as well as Hannaford, Food Lion, Pea Pod and Giant supermarkets – to halt contracts with companies that have major ties to Brazilian agribusiness, like Cargill and JBS, until the situation is remedied.”

*Photo credit: Fire burns in Brazilian forest (2017, Jim Wickens/Ecostorm).Brazil’s space agency says a record number of fires like these are burning